Archival Presentation Notice: This article modernizes the multimedia presentation “Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty” originally presented by E. Marc Mariani, MD (Salt Lake Orthopaedic Clinic). The historical Flash lecture has been reconstructed into the synchronized video slide presentation above, with the original file preserved in the digital archives (the_anterior_approach-mariani.swf).
1. High-Yield Summary
- Primary Clinical Indication: End-stage symptomatic primary or secondary osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, or femoral neck fractures of the hip requiring primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).
- Internervous & Intermuscular Plane: Explores the true Hueter interval between the tensor fasciae latae (superior gluteal nerve) laterally and the sartorius and rectus femoris (femoral nerve) medially, sparing the posterior abductor complex and posterior capsule.
- The Critical Move: Complete, sequential capsuloligamentous releases (conjoint tendon and piriformis sparing, with targeted pubofemoral and posterior-superior capsulotomy) paired with operative leg hyperextension, external rotation, and adduction to safely elevate the proximal femur out of the wound.
- Catastrophic Error to Avoid: Aggressive femoral broaching or levering before establishing adequate posterior-superior capsular release, which risks catastrophic proximal femur perforation or spiral greater trochanteric fracture, or violent medial traction injuring the femoral nerve.
2. Indications & Patient Selection
The direct anterior approach (DAA) provides true muscle-sparing access to the hip joint through an intermuscular and internervous plane. Appropriate patient selection is critical, particularly during the initial surgical learning curve.
Indications
- Severe debilitating hip osteoarthritis refractory to nonoperative management (physical therapy, pharmacotherapy, intra-articular injections).
- Avascular necrosis of the femoral head (Ficat Stage III/IV) with femoral head collapse.
- Rapidly progressive post-traumatic osteoarthritis.
- Displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in active independent elderly candidates indicated for arthroplasty.
- Patients prioritizing accelerated early post-surgical rehabilitation and reduced postoperative dislocation risk.
Relative Contraindications & Challenging Anatomical Subsets
- Severe Morbid Obesity with Abdominal Pannus: A pendulous abdominal pannus creates a dependent, moist fold overlying the anterior groin incision, significantly increasing the risk of wound dehiscence and surgical site infection.
- Previous Abdominal or Pelvic Osteotomy Hardware: Prior anterior pelvic ring plating or complex acetabular reconstruction with anterior scar tissue.
- Severe Hip Dysplasia (Crowe Type III/IV): High hip dislocations requiring extensive subtrochanteric shortening osteotomies or broad posterior column access.
- Extreme Muscularity or Hypertrophic Musculature: Stiff, highly muscular males limit soft-tissue mobility, increasing tension across the tensor fasciae latae and femoral retractors during initial exposure.
- Severe Osteopenia / Osteoporosis: Extreme bone fragility markedly heightens the risk of calcar crack or periprosthetic trochanteric fracture during femoral mobilization and broaching.
3. Preoperative Planning & Templating
Accurate digital or calibrated analog templating is mandatory before entering the operating room to predict femoral offset, center of rotation, leg length equality, and component sizing.
Imaging Review
- High-Quality Anteroposterior (AP) Pelvis: Centered over the pubic symphysis with both lower extremities internally rotated 15 degrees to accurately account for femoral neck anteversion and calculate true femoral offset.
- Dedicated Cross-Table Lateral or Frog-Leg Lateral Hip: Evaluates anterior/posterior acetabular bone stock, femoral canal morphology (Dorr classification Type A, B, or C), and anterior femoral cortical bow.
- Spinopelvic Assessment: Standing and seated lateral radiographs in patients with documented lumbar spinal fusion or degenerative kyphosis to evaluate pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and dynamic pelvic mobility, avoiding functional impingement.
Templating Objectives
- Determine the planned level of the femoral neck osteotomy relative to the lesser trochanter.
- Establish target acetabular cup abduction (40 degrees ± 10 degrees) and anteversion (15 degrees to 20 degrees).
- Select optimal femoral stem geometry (e.g., collarless tapered-wedge, collared compact-stem, or shortened curved-stem designed to ease anterior entry).
4. Operating Room Setup & Patient Positioning
The direct anterior approach can be performed on either a specialized orthopaedic traction table (such as the Hana or PROfx table) or a standard radiolucent flat operating table. While both achieve equivalent long-term outcomes, specialized traction tables facilitate reproducible multiplanar limb manipulation and automated femoral elevation.
Specialized Traction Table Setup (Hana / PROfx Table)
- Patient Orientation: The patient is placed in the supine position on the padded pelvic spar. Well-padded peroneal posts protect against pudendal nerve traction neuropraxia.
- Boots & Spars: Bilateral feet are locked securely into padded traction boots attached to articulated spars. Spars allow independent traction, rotation, adduction, and hyperextension under direct sterile control.
- Mechanical Femoral Hook: A sterile mechanical bone hook or femoral lift bracket connects to the motorized table elevator to hoist the proximal femur out of the surgical wound during canal preparation.
- Fluoroscopy Integration: A sterile-draped C-arm fluoroscope is placed contralateral to the operative hip, positioned to swing in perpendicularly for real-time intraoperative AP pelvis verification of component position and leg length.
Standard Radiolucent Table Setup
- The patient is positioned supine on a radiolucent flat table with both legs prepped and draped freely into the sterile field.
- Femoral exposure relies on manual extension of the operative leg off the side of the table or dropping the lower breakable table segment, combined with manual external rotation and adduction beneath the contralateral leg (“figure-of-four” or cross-leg extension).
5. Surgical Anatomy & Internervous Intervals
The hallmark of the direct anterior approach is its intermuscular and internervous trajectory, avoiding detachment of major tendons or denervation of muscle groups.
Superficial Interval (Hueter Interval)
- Boundary: Lies between the Tensor Fasciae Latae (TFL) laterally and the Sartorius medially.
- Innervation: TFL is innervated by the superior gluteal nerve (L4–S1); Sartorius is innervated by the femoral nerve (L2–L4). This constitutes a true internervous plane.
- Deep Fascia Incision: The superficial investing fascia must be incised directly over the belly of the TFL, approximately 1 to 2 cm lateral to the palpated muscular interspace, to ensure the sartorial sheath remains undisturbed.
Deep Interval
- Boundary: Lies between the Tensor Fasciae Latae (TFL) laterally and the Rectus Femoris (straight and reflected heads) medially.
- Innervation: Rectus femoris is innervated by the femoral nerve (L2–L4), maintaining the internervous demarcation.
- Vascular Crossing: The ascending branches of the lateral femoral circumflex artery (LFCA) cross transversely directly through this deep interspace and must be identified, mobilized, and electrocauterized or clipped to prevent brisk arterial hemorrhage.
6. Danger Zones & Neurovascular Safety
Meticulous technique and acute awareness of anterior anatomical danger zones protect against major vascular and neurological morbidity.
Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN)
- Anatomy & Arborization: The LFCN emerges beneath or through the inguinal ligament, typically medial to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). It exhibits substantial anatomical variation, branching early in up to 30% of patients into anterior and lateral arborizing branches.
- Surgical Avoidance: Keep the skin and fascial incisions strictly 2 to 3 cm lateral and distal to the ASIS. Incise directly over the lateral third of the TFL fascia. Retraction of the medial soft tissues must be gentle; do not place sharp prongs or aggressive Hohmann retractors directly against the sartorius belly.
- Clinical Manifestation: Injury or traction neuropraxia causes meralgia paresthetica (numbness, dysesthesia, or burning hyperalgesia across the anterolateral thigh).
Femoral Nerve and Vessels
- The femoral sheath (nerve, artery, vein) lies medial to the iliopsoas muscle and rectus femoris.
- Never place retractors blindly over the anterior or medial acetabular wall without establishing direct bony contact under direct vision. Anterior acetabular retractors must rest subperiosteally directly on bone, using the iliopsoas and rectus as protective soft-tissue cushions.
Superior Gluteal Nerve Branches
- The terminal anterior branches of the superior gluteal nerve enter the posterior aspect of the TFL muscle belly approximately 8 to 10 cm distal to the iliac crest.
- Excessive distal muscular dissection or vigorous lateral retraction directly across the TFL belly can cause transient abductor lurch or muscle atrophy.
7. Granular Step-by-Step Operative Technique
Step 1: Incision & Superficial Exposure
- Palpate: Identify and palpate the Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (ASIS) and the greater trochanter.
- Incise: Make an 8 to 10 cm longitudinal or slightly oblique skin incision starting 2 to 3 cm distal and 2 cm lateral to the ASIS, directed toward the head of the fibula.
- Dissect: Carry sharp dissection through subcutaneous fat until the glistening aponeurosis of the fascia lata overlying the TFL is exposed. Coagulate bleeding superficial perforating vessels.
- Fascial Incision: Incise the TFL fascia longitudinally along its muscle belly, staying 1 to 2 cm lateral to the intermuscular fat strip. Developing this lateral fascial flap protects the LFCN branches residing medial within the sartorius sheath.
Step 2: Deep Dissection & Vascular Control
- Retract: Bluntly sweep the TFL muscle laterally using a finger to open the deep retrofascial space. Retract the TFL muscle belly laterally with a blunt Cobra or Bennett retractor.
- Ligate Ascending LFCA: In the distal part of the exposure, identify the ascending leash of the lateral femoral circumflex artery and accompanying venae comitantes crossing the space. Securely seal these vessels using bipolar electrocautery, vascular clips, or heavy silk ties.
- Expose Anterior Capsule: Retract the rectus femoris medially with an intracapsular or perivesical retractor. Clear the pericapsular fatty tissue overlying the anterior hip capsule using Cobb elevators.
Step 3: Capsulotomy & Femoral Neck Osteotomy
- Place Retractors: Position a curved Hohmann retractor superiorly over the anterior acetabular rim and a second retractor inferiorly beneath the femoral neck at the base of the calcar, maintaining constant bone contact.
- Capsulotomy: Perform an inverted-T, H-shaped, or complete anterior capsular resection. If preserving capsule for repair, tag the capsular flaps with heavy stay sutures.
- Femoral Neck Osteotomy: Perform the femoral neck cut in situ based on preoperative templating. A double-cut technique (excising a 1 to 1.5 cm cylindrical “napkin ring” or wafer of femoral neck) significantly facilitates subsequent extraction of the femoral head using a corkscrew without damaging the acetabular rim or tearing the tensor muscle.
- Extract Head: Insert a corkscrew into the femoral head, rotate to disrupt the ligamentum teres, and extract the femoral head from the socket.
Step 4: Acetabular Preparation & Cup Impaction
- Expose Acetabulum: Place three retractors around the acetabulum: (1) an anterior retractor resting on the anterior wall/pubic bone, (2) a posterior-superior retractor resting on the ischium, and (3) an inferior retractor resting in the obturator foramen.
- Debride Labrum: Excise the anterior, superior, and posterior labrum and remove the pulvinar down to the true floor (cotyloid fossa) to reveal the transverse acetabular ligament.
- Ream: Use curved or offset reamer handles to ream sequentially down to bleeding subchondral bone, maintaining an inclination of 40 degrees and anteversion of 15 to 20 degrees. Avoid anterior column blowout.
- Impact Cup: Impact the uncemented hemispherical acetabular component using an offset cup impactor. Verify stability, place supplemental acetabular screws if bone quality dictates, and seat the polyethylene or ceramic liner with complete circumferential engagement.
Step 5: Femoral Mobilization & Sequential Capsular Releases
- Limb Manipulation: Release traction, hyperextend the operative limb (drop the spar 20 to 30 degrees), externally rotate the foot 90 to 120 degrees, and adduct the limb beneath the contralateral spar.
- Elevate Proximal Femur: Engage a sterile bone hook around the calcar or insert an elevator beneath the greater trochanter to deliver the femur anteriorly and laterally into the operative corridor.
- Sequential Releases: Release the posterior-superior capsule from the saddle of the femoral neck. Release the pubofemoral ligament and the reflected head of the rectus femoris. If tension persists, selectively release the conjoint tendon (gemelli/obturator internus) off the medial facet of the trochanter while carefully preserving the piriformis and obturator externus tendons to prevent abductor destabilization.
Step 6: Femoral Broaching, Trialing & Final Implantation
- Canal Entry: Clear remaining lateral trochanteric bone overhang with a box osteotome or trochanteric reamer to prevent varus component placement.
- Broach Sequentially: Utilizing double-offset or dual-angled broach handles, sequentially broach the femoral canal aligned with the native femoral version until rotational and axial cortical stability is achieved.
- Fluoroscopic Confirmation & Trial Reduction: Attach trial neck and head components. Reduce the hip by reversing external rotation and extension under traction. Assess hip stability through full extension, external rotation, and 90 degrees flexion. Obtain an intraoperative fluoroscopic AP pelvis image to confirm cup anteversion, stem alignment, offset restoration, and leg length parity.
- Final Implantation: Dislocate the trial hip, remove the trial broach, impact the final uncemented stem, clean and dry the femoral taper, impact the ceramic or cobalt-chrome modular head, and reduce the joint.
- Closure: Irrigate copiously. Reapproximate the anterior capsule if preserved. Close the TFL fascial sheath meticulously with running absorbable sutures. Close dermal and subcuticular layers in anatomical planes.
8. Pearls and Pitfalls
| Surgical Domain | Master Class Pearls | Common Pitfalls & Rescue Actions |
|---|---|---|
| Superficial Exposure | Incise fascia 1.5 cm lateral to the TFL muscular margin; this creates a lateral protective envelope sheltering the LFCN branches. | Medial incision directly over the sartorius; causes inadvertent injury to primary LFCN trunks resulting in permanent painful meralgia paresthetica. |
| Vascular Hemostasis | Identify the fatty interval harboring the ascending LFCA leash early; coagulate before placing deep self-retaining retractors. | Avulsion of the ascending LFCA by retractor traction; retracts into the deep pelvis and leads to brisk arterial hemorrhage and retroperitoneal hematoma. |
| Femoral Neck Cut | Perform a two-stage parallel osteotomy (“napkin-ring” cut); removing a wafer creates immediate space for safe head retrieval. | Single low cut with levering; risks fracturing the posterior acetabular rim or tearing the tensor fasciae latae muscle belly. |
| Femoral Elevation | Release the posterior-superior capsule cleanly along the medial surface of the greater trochanter until the calcar delivers effortlessly. | Forcing the femur up with excessive elevator leverage without releasing the capsule; causes calcar fracture or spiral greater trochanteric fracture. |
| Broach Trajectory | Clear lateral trochanteric overhang thoroughly; ensure the broach enters parallel to the femoral axis under direct visualization. | Inadequate lateral trochanteric clearance; forces the broach into varus and risks lateral femoral cortical perforation. |
9. Postoperative Rehabilitation & Protocol
Because the direct anterior approach preserves the posterior abductor mechanism and posterior capsule, traditional posterior hip dislocation precautions (e.g., flexion > 90 degrees, adduction, internal rotation restrictions) are generally unnecessary, facilitating rapid functional independence.
Immediate Postoperative Phase (Day of Surgery to Week 2)
- Weight-Bearing: Full weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) immediately with physical therapy. Patients mobilize on postoperative day 0.
- Precautions: Dislocation precautions are not routinely prescribed. Patients are cautioned against extreme hyperextension combined with aggressive external rotation during the initial 6 weeks.
- Thromboprophylaxis: Dual mechanical (sequential compression devices) and chemical thromboprophylaxis (aspirin 81 mg BID for 4 to 6 weeks in standard-risk patients; direct oral anticoagulants in high-risk patients) according to AAOS guidelines.
Intermediate & Long-Term Recovery (Weeks 2 to 12+)
- Weeks 2 to 6: Discontinue assistive ambulatory devices (walker or cane) as gait stability and gluteal endurance normalize. Focus on pelvic leveling and closed-chain core strengthening.
- Weeks 6 to 12: Progressive resisted hip abduction, gluteal strengthening, stationary cycling, and low-impact cardiovascular training.
- Beyond 12 Weeks: Unrestricted return to recreational sports, hiking, swimming, and low-impact athletic activities.
10. Clinical Outcomes & Recovery Milestones
Modern comparative trials demonstrate that patients undergoing direct anterior THA achieve faster initial functional milestones, shorter hospital lengths of stay, and lower early opioid consumption compared to traditional posterior or direct lateral approaches.
- Early Functional Superiority: Randomized trials confirm earlier cessation of canes and walkers, superior gait velocity at 2 to 6 weeks, and lower visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores in the immediate 48 to 72 hours.
- Dislocation Resistance: The preservation of the posterior capsule and external rotators yields an exceptionally low posterior dislocation rate (<0.5%–0.8%), without necessitating cumbersome sitting or sleeping restrictions.
- Mid- and Long-Term Equivalence: By 3 to 6 months postoperatively, functional scoring systems (Harris Hip Score, HOOS Jr., Oxford Hip Score) and implant survivorship demonstrate parity across anterior, posterior, and lateral surgical approaches.
11. Complications & Avoidance Strategies
Understanding approach-specific complications is paramount to maintaining high patient safety standards.
Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) Neuropraxia
- Reported in 5% to 30% of cases. Most episodes represent transient neurapraxia due to retractor stretch and resolve spontaneously over 3 to 12 months.
- Mitigation: Stay strictly lateral to the TFL fascia and avoid vigorous medial retractor placement against the sartorius.
Intraoperative Femoral Fractures
- Greater trochanteric avulsions or calcar fractures occur predominantly during the initial learning curve (first 50 to 100 cases).
- Mitigation: Never force femoral elevation against unreleased capsule. If a non-displaced calcar split occurs during broaching, promptly place a prophylactic cerclage cable prior to seating the final stem.
Wound Complications in Obese Patients
- Moisture and maceration beneath an abdominal apron can lead to superficial surgical site infection.
- Mitigation: Retract and tape the abdominal pannus superiorly prior to prep. Utilize an oblique (“bikini”) incision along Langer’s skin cleavage lines or apply incisional negative pressure wound therapy in high-risk patients.
12. Learning Curve & Transition Strategies
The learning curve for the direct anterior approach is well-documented in orthopaedic literature, typically encompassing 50 to 100 cases. Early in the transition, operative times, fluoroscopy exposure, and complication rates are elevated.
- Structured Mentorship: Transitioning surgeons should participate in cadaveric training modules and operative proctorship with an experienced anterior approach surgeon.
- Case Stratification: Initial cases should be carefully selected: non-obese patients (BMI < 30 kg/m²), Dorr Type A or B bone morphology, absence of severe contractures, and primary osteoarthritis.
- Routine Fluoroscopy: Utilize real-time fluoroscopic feedback to confirm component version, offset, and leg length parity until procedural landmarks are fully mastered.
13. Evidence-Based Synthesis
Modern clinical decision-making is grounded in high-quality randomized controlled trials and prospective registry analyses, corroborated by seminal biomechanical and anatomical descriptions.
| Clinical Question / Investigation | Level of Evidence | Pivotal Landmark Study | Study Design & Methodology | Cohort Size / Follow-up | Primary Outcome / Effect Size | DOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early functional recovery, narcotic consumption, and complication profiles comparing DAA vs posterior and lateral approaches | Level I | Ang JJM, Onggo JR, Stokes CM et al (2023) | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | 73 comparative studies (18,485 patients) | DAA demonstrated significantly reduced visual analog scale pain scores and shorter length of stay during the first 48 hours postoperatively, with equivalent 1-year functional scores and revision rates compared to posterior and lateral approaches. | DOI |
| Network meta-analysis ranking surgical approaches for hip arthroplasty regarding dislocation, infection, and early functional recovery | Level I | Yan L, Ge L, Dong S et al (2023) | Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis | 94 randomized controlled trials (10,123 hips) | DAA ranked highest for early functional recovery and lowest for posterior dislocation risk, but exhibited higher risk of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropraxia and intraoperative femoral fracture during the learning curve. | DOI |
| Prospective randomized comparison of early functional milestones, pain, and component position between DAA and posterolateral THA | Level I | Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP (2013) | Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial | 87 patients randomized (43 DAA vs 44 posterolateral) | DAA patients achieved discontinuation of assistive ambulatory devices earlier and exhibited superior early pain relief and functional scores up to 6 weeks, after which outcomes equilibrated without differences in component positioning. | DOI |
| Safety, efficacy, fluoroscopic cup positioning, and complication rates of single-incision anterior THA using an orthopaedic traction table | Level IV | Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T (2005) | Prospective Case Series & Landmark Technique Description | 494 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties | Landmark series demonstrating 0.61% dislocation rate, high precision in acetabular component inclination (mean 41°) and anteversion (mean 18°), establishing modern traction-table-assisted anterior hip arthroplasty technique. | DOI |
| Surgical anatomy, internervous plane navigation, table positioning, instrumentation, and complication mitigation during DAA THA | Level V | Post ZD, Orozco F, Diaz-Ledezma C, Hozack WJ, Ong A (2014) | Surgical Technique Review & Consensus Analysis | Systematic consensus and operative protocol | Comprehensive surgical standard defining intermuscular/internervous intervals (superficial: TFL-sartorius; deep: TFL-rectus femoris), ascending branch of lateral femoral circumflex artery ligation, femoral capsular release sequences, and danger zones. | DOI |
14. References
- Ang JJM, Onggo JR, Stokes CM et al. Comparing direct anterior approach versus posterior approach or lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023. doi:10.1007/s00590-023-03528-8 [Level I: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis]
- Yan L, Ge L, Dong S et al. Evaluation of Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53942 [Level I: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis]
- Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP. Prospective Randomized Study of Direct Anterior vs Postero-Lateral Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.034 [Level I: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial]
- Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty on an Orthopaedic Table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000194309.70518.cb [Level IV: Prospective Case Series & Landmark Technique Description]
- Post ZD, Orozco F, Diaz-Ledezma C, Hozack WJ, Ong A. Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-22-09-595 [Level V: Surgical Technique Review & Consensus Analysis]
15. Master Class Pro-Tip
“Master Class Surgical Pearl: The secret to effortless femoral exposure during the direct anterior approach lies in the complete, systematic release of the posterior-superior capsule directly off the saddle of the femoral neck, coupled with precise release of the pubofemoral ligament. If the proximal femur refuses to deliver into the wound, do not apply forceful elevator torque—which frequently shears the greater trochanter or fractures the calcar. Instead, check that the operative extremity is fully hyperextended, adducted beneath the opposite leg, and externally rotated 90 degrees; then gently sweep a curved elevator along the inner aspect of the greater trochanter to release remaining tethering posterior capsular bands. Once these fibers are divided, the femur will elevate effortlessly into the surgical field without mechanical resistance.”
Master Class Surgical Pearl
Last Updated on September 26, 2026
🔗 Knowledge Graph & Clinical Correlates
OrthopaedicsOne Living Semantic Network🛠️ Operative Techniques
- Valgus osteotomy for Perthes disease Pediatrics
- Valgus osteotomy for development coxa vara Hip and Knee
🩺 Clinical Conditions & Indications
- Which EMR should I choose Original Clinical Contribution: Authored for the OrthopaedicsOne General Orthopaedics Specialty Section. Preserved, digitized, and updated to modern evidence-based...
🔬 Anatomy, Pathology & Diagnostics
- Why I Would Not Consider Navigating My THA Hip Joint & Proximal Femur
- Why I Would Consider Navigating My THA Hip Joint & Proximal Femur
- Why I Use Metal on Metal Hip Joint & Proximal Femur
- Why I Use Cross-Linked Polyethylene Hip Joint & Proximal Femur
