• O1 Network
    • Articles
    • For Residents
    • For Medical Students
    • PORT Notes
    • MSK Medicine
    • Tumor Library
    • Cases
    • Talks
    • Images
    • Viewpoints
    • Question Bank
    • Devices
    • Residency
    • Fellowships
    • Associations
    • Companies
ORTHOPAEDICSONE ARTICLES
OrthopaedicsOne Articles
  • Articles
    • Specialty
      • Arthroscopy
      • Foot and Ankle
      • Hand and Wrist
      • Hip and Knee
      • Infection
      • Joint Reconstruction
      • Musculoskeletal Medicine
      • Pediatrics
      • Shoulder and Elbow
      • Spine
      • Sports Medicine
      • Trauma
      • Tumor
    • Regional
      • Anatomy
      • Basic Science
      • Classifications
      • Diagnostic Tests
      • Evidence-Based Orthopaedics
      • Operative Techniques
      • Pain Management
      • Physical Examination
      • Pharmacology
      • Radiology
      • Rehabilitation
      • Rheumatology
      • Surgical Approaches
    • Professional
      • Bioethics
      • Economics and Health Policy
      • Epidemiology and Biostatistics
      • History of Orthopaedics
      • Informatics
      • Medicolegal
      • Mobile and Wireless
      • Practice Management
  • Reviews
    • For Residents
    • For Medical Students
  • eBooks
    • PORT Notes
    • MSK Medicine
    • Tumor Library
  • Community
    • Cases
    • Talks
    • Images
    • Viewpoints
    • Question Bank
    • Devices
  • Pages
    • Residency
    • Fellowships
    • Associations
    • Companies
  • About O1
    • Overview
    • FAQs
    • Managing Editors
    • Editorial Board
    • Content Partners
    • Participating Groups
    • Advisory Board
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Posterior cruciate ligament sprain

1. High-Yield Summary

  • Primary Biomechanical Restraint: The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is the primary static stabilizer against posterior tibial translation, providing greater than 95% of the total restraint across the functional flexion arc, with peak tensile demand at 90 degrees of knee flexion.
  • Injury Mechanisms: Most frequently triggered by a direct high-energy posterior force applied to the proximal tibia with the knee in 90 degrees of flexion (classic dashboard injury), a fall onto a hyperflexed knee with the foot in plantarflexion, or severe hyperextension trauma in multiligament knee injuries.
  • Diagnostic Cardinal Tests: The posterior drawer test (90 degrees flexion with loss of the normal 10 mm anterior tibial step-off), posterior sag sign (Godfrey test), and quadriceps active test form the diagnostic triad. Dial testing at 30 and 90 degrees is mandatory to differentiate isolated tears from combined posterolateral corner (PLC) disruptions.
  • Nonoperative Management Rule: Isolated Grade I (1–5 mm) and Grade II (6–10 mm) sprains possess substantial intrinsic healing capacity within the vascularized synovial envelope and are managed nonoperatively with dynamic posterior-relieving extension bracing, protected weight-bearing, and intensive quadriceps strengthening.
  • Operative Thresholds: Anatomic surgical reconstruction is strictly indicated for acute bony avulsions, symptomatic high-grade isolated tears (Grade III, greater than 10 mm posterior translation with drop-off behind femoral condyles) failing conservative therapy, and all combined ligamentous injuries (PCL plus PLC or multiligament knee dislocations).

2. Anatomy

The posterior cruciate ligament originates from a broad, semicircular footprint on the anterolateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle within the intercondylar notch. It courses obliquely downward, backward, and laterally to insert onto the posterior intercondylar fossa of the tibia (PCL facet), approximately 1.0 to 1.5 cm distal to the articular margin of the joint line.

The ligament is composed of two distinct, synergistically active functional bundles that vary in length, orientation, and tension through knee range of motion:

  • Anterolateral (AL) Bundle: The larger and biomechanically stiffer component. It originates anteriorly on the medial femoral condyle and inserts on the anterolateral aspect of the tibial footprint. The AL bundle tightens in progressive knee flexion (optimal tension at 90 degrees) and becomes lax in terminal extension.
  • Posteromedial (PM) Bundle: Smaller in cross-sectional diameter. It originates posteriorly on the medial femoral condyle and inserts onto the posteromedial aspect of the tibial facet. The PM bundle tightens in extension and becomes lax throughout mid-flexion.
  • Meniscofemoral Ligaments: Present in 70% to 80% of knees, arising from the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. The ligament of Humphry traverses anterior to the PCL, whereas the ligament of Wrisberg courses posterior to the PCL, inserting on the medial femoral condyle and contributing secondary posterior stability.

Neurovascular Danger Zones: The popliteal neurovascular bundle (popliteal artery, popliteal vein, and tibial nerve) lies in immediate proximity to the posterior knee capsule and PCL tibial insertion. In full knee extension, the popliteal artery is separated from the posterior tibial cortex by merely 2 to 5 mm of capsular tissue. When the knee is flexed to 90 degrees, capsular compliance allows the artery to displace posteriorly, increasing the safety margin to approximately 8 to 10 mm. Over-penetration of guide pins or reamers during transtibial drilling carries catastrophic risk of popliteal transection or pseudoaneurysm formation.

Surgical Corridors and Internervous Planes: Open posterior approaches to the PCL tibial insertion (Burks and Schaffer approach) utilize the intermuscular interval between the medial head of the gastrocnemius (innervated by the tibial nerve) and the semimembranosus tendon (innervated by the tibial nerve). Lateral approaches to address combined posterolateral structures utilize the internervous plane between the lateral gastrocnemius (tibial nerve) and the biceps femoris (common peroneal nerve).

3. Pathogenesis

The PCL functions as the primary static constraint against posterior displacement of the tibia relative to the femur, resisting up to 90% of posterior translation force at 90 degrees of flexion. It functions as a secondary constraint against tibial external rotation, internal rotation, and varus/valgus angulation. Structural failure occurs when applied vector forces exceed the ultimate tensile yield strength of the collagen matrix (approximately 2500 to 3000 N in young healthy tissue).

Three distinct injury mechanisms predominate in clinical practice:

  • Direct Pretibial Trauma (“Dashboard Injury”): In motor vehicle collisions, posterior translational force is applied directly to the anterior proximal tibia when it strikes the dashboard with the knee flexed at 90 degrees. This drives the tibia posteriorly, loading the AL bundle to failure.
  • Hyperflexion with Plantarflexion: Commonly observed in football, wrestling, and alpine skiing. A fall onto the flexed knee with the foot plantarflexed causes the anterior tibial tuberosity to strike the turf first, forcing posterior translation while eccentric quadriceps tension magnifies intra-ligamentous strain.
  • Severe Hyperextension with Varus/Valgus Force: High-velocity athletic collisions or industrial trauma forcing the knee into extreme hyperextension causes initial failure of the anterior cruciate ligament, followed by tensile rupture of the PCL and posterior capsule. Such mechanisms carry an exceptionally high frequency of bicruciate knee dislocation and vascular compromise.

Biomechanical Role of Posterior Tibial Slope: Sagittal bony geometry directly influences PCL loading. A flattened or decreased posterior tibial slope eliminates the anterior vector component generated by axial weight-bearing, shifting shear stress posteriorly and markedly increasing baseline tensile strain on the native PCL or reconstructive graft.

4. Natural History

Posterior cruciate ligament sprains account for approximately 3% to 20% of all reported knee ligamentous trauma. Isolated PCL disruptions comprise roughly 30% to 40% of cases, whereas 60% to 70% occur in the context of multiligamentous knee injuries, most notably combined with posterolateral corner (PLC) or medial collateral ligament (MCL) disruptions.

Unlike the anterior cruciate ligament, the native PCL is surrounded by a rich vascular synovial sheath (supplied by branches of the middle genicular artery) and maintains substantial intrinsic biologic healing capacity. In isolated Grade I and Grade II injuries managed with early dynamic posterior support and active quadriceps rehabilitation, prospective natural history investigations demonstrate that approximately 80% to 90% of competitive athletes return to sport at their pre-injury level of participation.

However, chronic untreated Grade III PCL deficiency or unrecognized combined PCL-PLC injury results in persistent posterior tibial subluxation. This unconstrained posterior translation alters tibiofemoral kinematics, concentrating contact pressures onto the medial femoral condyle and patellofemoral articulation. Long-term longitudinal follow-up beyond 10 to 15 years demonstrates a progressive incidence of medial compartment and patellofemoral chondrosis and premature degenerative osteoarthritis.

5. Clinical Presentation

History

Patients with isolated PCL tears frequently present with a more subtle, indolent clinical picture than those with acute ACL ruptures. Clinicians should specifically query:

  • Mechanism and Energy Vector: Direct blow to the anterior proximal tibia (dashboard, helmet impact), fall onto a flexed knee, or hyperextension episode.
  • Symptom Profile: Vague anterior knee pain, dull retropatellar aching, or subjective discomfort when decelerating, walking down inclines, descending stairs, or squatting.
  • Gross Instability vs Giving Way: Patients rarely report the dramatic “giving way” or audible “pop” characteristic of ACL tears unless accompanied by collateral or capsular disruption. Mild to moderate swelling and hemarthrosis develop over 12 to 24 hours.

Physical Exam

Systematic provocative physical examination is the foundation of accurate PCL diagnosis:

  • Posterior Sag Sign (Godfrey Test): Patient supine with hips and knees flexed to 90 degrees while the examiner supports the heels. The proximal tibia drops posteriorly due to gravity, obliterating the normal tibial prominence [Sensitivity 79%, Specificity 100%].
  • Posterior Drawer Test: Performed with the knee at 90 degrees flexion, foot in neutral rotation, and hamstrings relaxed. Thumbs placed on the medial and lateral joint lines while applying a firm posterior directed load to the proximal tibia. Normal anatomy exhibits a 10 mm anterior step-off of the medial tibial plateau relative to the femoral condyle; reduction or reversal of this step-off indicates PCL insufficiency [Sensitivity 90%, Specificity 99%].
  • Quadriceps Active Test: Knee flexed to 90 degrees with the foot flat on the table. The patient gently contracts the quadriceps against resistance. In a PCL-deficient knee, quadriceps contraction pulls the posteriorly sagged tibia anteriorly back to neutral alignment [Sensitivity 54%, Specificity 97%].
  • Dial Test (Tibial External Rotation at 30° and 90°): Patient prone; examiner applies external rotation torque to both feet. Increased external rotation greater than 10 degrees at 30 degrees only signifies isolated posterolateral corner injury; increased external rotation greater than 10 degrees at both 30 and 90 degrees confirms combined PCL and PLC injury [Sensitivity 88%, Specificity 95%].
  • Reverse Pivot-Shift Test: The knee is brought from 90 degrees flexion into extension while applying valgus stress and external rotation. A positive test reveals reduction of a posteriorly subluxated lateral tibial plateau at 20 to 30 degrees of extension [Sensitivity 45%, Specificity 92%].

6. Imaging and Diagnostic Studies

Plain Radiography: Initial evaluation must include weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP), true lateral, 45-degree flexion posteroanterior (Rosenberg view), and merchant/skyline views. Plain radiographs assess for:

  • Bony Avulsion Fractures: Discrete bony fragments displaced from the posterior tibial fovea (PCL tibial avulsion) or medial femoral condyle.
  • Posterior Sag on Lateral View: Posterior resting translation of the tibial plateau relative to the distal femoral condyles.
  • Posterior Tibial Slope Assessment: Measured on true lateral radiographs; values below 5 to 7 degrees indicate a flattened slope that increases biomechanical strain on the PCL.
  • Secondary Signs: Arcuate complex avulsion (fibular head styloid fracture) or Segond fractures denoting associated peripheral ligamentous disruptions.

Stress Radiography (Telos or Kneeling Views): Quantified bilateral posterior stress radiography is the objective gold standard for grading posterior knee laxity and operative planning:

  • Side-to-Side Difference < 8 mm: Indicates a partial PCL tear (Grade I or II) with preserved secondary restraints.
  • Side-to-Side Difference 8 to 12 mm: Signifies a complete, isolated PCL tear.
  • Side-to-Side Difference > 12 mm: Establishes a combined PCL and posterolateral corner or multiligamentous injury.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): MRI boasts high sensitivity (96% to 100%) and specificity (97% to 99%) in the acute setting (within 4 to 6 weeks of injury). Fluid-sensitive T2-weighted and proton density sequences demonstrate discontinuity, high signal intensity within the ligament substance, or avulsion from femoral or tibial footprints. In chronic settings, MRI can be deceptive because the PCL often heals in continuity with homogeneous low signal despite functional elongation, necessitating clinical and stress radiographic correlation.

7. Classification

Clinical classification is based on the magnitude of posterior tibial translation measured during the posterior drawer test at 90 degrees of knee flexion relative to the femoral condyles and contralateral uninjured knee:

Classification GradePosterior TranslationAnatomical Landmark RelationshipManagement Strategy
Grade I (Mild)1 to 5 mmTibial plateau remains anterior to femoral condyles; step-off diminished but preserved.Nonoperative: Dynamic extension bracing for 2–4 weeks; early quadriceps rehabilitation; rapid return to activity.
Grade II (Moderate)6 to 10 mmAnterior tibial plateau is flush with the anterior margin of the medial femoral condyle.Nonoperative primary: Dynamic PCL-relieving bracing for 6 weeks; aggressive quadriceps strengthening; surgery reserved for symptomatic high-demand athletes.
Grade III (Severe)> 10 mmAnterior tibial plateau drops behind the femoral condyles (loss of all step-off).High suspicion for combined ligament injury; operative reconstruction indicated for acute multiligament tears, symptomatic chronic instability, or young athletes.
Bony AvulsionVariableDisplaced osseous fragment from the posterior tibial facet or medial femoral condyle.Acute operative reduction and internal fixation (open or arthroscopic cannulated screw / suture anchor fixation).

8. Treatment

Medical / Nonoperative

Nonoperative management is the standard of care for isolated Grade I and Grade II PCL sprains:

  • Dynamic Posterior-Relieving Bracing: Application of a dynamic PCL brace (e.g., Jack PCL brace) that applies a continuous, anteriorly directed translational force against the posterior proximal calf to maintain anatomic reduction while the knee heals. Bracing is maintained full-time for 6 to 12 weeks.
  • Weight-Bearing Parameters: Protected weight-bearing with crutches in full extension for 2 to 4 weeks, transitioning to weight-bearing as tolerated once quadriceps control is re-established.
  • Quadriceps-Dominant Rehabilitation: Immediate isometric and open-chain straight leg raises. Isolated active hamstring strengthening is strictly avoided for 8 to 12 weeks to eliminate posterior shear stress on the healing ligament. Closed-chain kinetic exercises (squats from 0 to 45 degrees) are initiated at 6 weeks.
  • Return to Sport Criteria: Symmetrical range of motion, absence of subjective instability, and quadriceps strength index greater than 90% compared to the contralateral limb (typically achieved between 8 and 16 weeks).

Operative

The primary surgical objective is to eliminate abnormal posterior tibial translation and restore normal tibiofemoral and patellofemoral contact mechanics:

  • Transtibial Single-Bundle Reconstruction: Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction isolating the dominant anterolateral (AL) bundle using robust allografts (Achilles tendon, anterior tibialis) or autografts (bone-patellar tendon-bone, quadriceps tendon). A tibial tunnel is drilled from the anteromedial proximal tibia to the posterior facet under direct 70-degree endoscopic visualization.
  • Anatomic Double-Bundle Reconstruction: Independent reconstruction of both the AL and PM bundles using separate femoral tunnels and either single or dual tibial tunnels, anatomically restoring native kinematics across the entire flexion arc.
  • Tibial Inlay Technique (Berg Approach): Utilizes an open posteromedial or direct posterior approach to affix a bone block directly into a sculpted trough in the tibial facet, eliminating the sharp 90-degree graft bend (“killer turn”) associated with transtibial tunnels.
  • Concomitant Realignment and Ligament Reconstruction: Simultaneous reconstruction of posterolateral corner structures is mandatory in combined injuries. In chronic PCL deficiency with varus malalignment or flat posterior tibial slope (less than 5 degrees), a slope-increasing medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) must be performed prior to or staged with PCL reconstruction.

Indications & Contraindications

  • Absolute Surgical Indications: Displaced acute bony PCL avulsions (greater than 3 mm displacement); multiligament knee injuries (KD-I through KD-V); combined PCL plus PLC or MCL disruptions (Grade III); acute Grade III PCL injuries in elite athletic populations.
  • Relative Surgical Indications: Chronic isolated Grade III PCL tears with persistent subjective instability, recurrent effusions, or functional limitations failing 3 to 6 months of supervised nonoperative therapy.
  • Contraindications: Asymptomatic isolated Grade I or II tears; advanced tricompartmental osteoarthritis; severe vascular insufficiency requiring emergency revascularization; active localized or systemic infection; non-compliant patient unable to tolerate prolonged dynamic bracing.

9. Outcome

Long-term clinical and patient-reported outcome measures depend significantly on injury acuity, tear completeness, and the presence of associated ligamentous pathology:

  • Nonoperative Results in Isolated Tears: Prospective investigations demonstrate favorable subjective functional outcomes (mean Lysholm score 85 to 90; subjective IKDC 84 to 87). Although objective physical examination demonstrates residual posterior laxity in over 70% of nonoperatively treated knees, this does not correlate directly with subjective disability or loss of athletic participation during the first decade post-injury.
  • Surgical Reconstruction Outcomes: Modern arthroscopic single-bundle and double-bundle techniques reliably restore knee stability, yielding significant improvements in validated outcome scores (mean postoperative Lysholm 88 to 92; Tegner activity score 6 to 7). Anatomic double-bundle reconstruction demonstrates superior biomechanical normalization of posterior and rotational translation in robotic cadaveric models, though comparative clinical trials report comparable subjective patient-reported outcome measures between techniques.
  • Graft Performance and Incorporation: Achilles allografts provide large cross-sectional area and robust initial tensile strength without donor site morbidity; bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts provide rigid osseous aperture fixation; quadriceps tendon autografts provide dense collagen fibrils with minimal anterior knee discomfort.

10. Complications

Complications associated with PCL trauma and surgical management are categorized chronologically:

  • Immediate / Intraoperative:
    • Popliteal neurovascular injury from posterior over-drilling or capsular plunging (arterial laceration, intimal tear, pseudoaneurysm).
    • Extravasation of irrigation fluid into the posterior calf compartment triggering acute compartment syndrome.
    • Iatrogenic chondral scuffing of the medial femoral condyle during portal or tunnel placement.
  • Early Postoperative (0 to 6 Weeks):
    • Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism related to immobilization and posterior venous stasis.
    • Arthrofibrosis and flexion contracture resulting from prolonged extension immobilization without controlled passive range of motion.
    • Superficial portal breakdown or deep periprosthetic infection.
  • Late Postoperative (> 6 Weeks):
    • Recurrent posterior laxity and graft attenuation due to the transtibial “killer turn”, unaddressed posterolateral corner deficiency, or flat tibial slope.
    • Progression of medial compartment and patellofemoral degenerative arthritis.
    • Hardware irritation or tibial aperture screw prominence requiring secondary implant removal.

11. Pearls and Pitfalls

  • The Diagnostic Step-Off Pearl: Always palpate the anterior medial joint line of the uninjured knee first to establish the patient’s baseline 10 mm anterior tibial step-off. A subluxated PCL-deficient knee will present with a flush or recessed tibia that can fool the examiner into diagnosing an anterior cruciate ligament tear when pulling the tibia back to neutral.
  • Trans-Septal Visualization Corridor: When operating arthroscopically, construct high posteromedial and posterolateral trans-septal portals using a 70-degree arthroscope. Direct visualization of the posterior tibial facet and placement of a broad curved retractor anterior to the capsule are non-negotiable safety requirements to protect the popliteal artery.
  • Flexion Angle Safety Rule: Maintain the operative knee at 90 degrees or greater of flexion during posterior tibial guide pin insertion and reaming. Gravitational displacement and posterior capsular compliance maximize the safe distance between the bone cortex and the popliteal neurovascular bundle.
  • The Unrecognized PLC Pitfall: Reconstructing a PCL in the presence of an overlooked Grade II or III posterolateral corner disruption exposes the graft to excessive rotational and varus torque, ensuring premature graft failure.
  • The Premature Hamstring Pitfall: Allowing open-chain active hamstring curls during early rehabilitation pulls the tibia posteriorly, stretching the healing native ligament or freshly fixed reconstructive graft.

12. Controversy

Single-Bundle vs Double-Bundle Reconstruction: Biomechanical investigations demonstrate that anatomic double-bundle reconstruction more accurately restores native tibiofemoral kinematics and resists posterior translation at both full extension and deep flexion. However, prospective randomized and comparative clinical trials have not consistently demonstrated statistically significant superiority in patient-reported outcome measures or return-to-sport rates. Proponents of single-bundle reconstruction highlight reduced operative time, simplified revision options, and lower technical complexity.

Transtibial vs Tibial Inlay Technique: The transtibial approach remains the international standard due to its minimally invasive, arthroscopic nature, but subjects the graft to repetitive friction and tensile shear across the acute angle at the posterior tibial exit (“killer turn”). The open tibial inlay technique fixes the bone block directly into the facet trough, eliminating the killer turn, but requires an open posterior dissection with increased soft-tissue morbidity and patient repositioning.

Threshold for Reconstruction in Isolated Grade III Tears: Considerable debate persists regarding the optimal management of acute isolated Grade III tears in athletic individuals. While conservative management achieves high functional satisfaction initially, long-term radiographic data reveal accelerating medial and patellofemoral arthrosis. Determining which asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients will progress to debilitating arthrosis remains an ongoing clinical challenge.

13. Evidence-Based Synthesis

Modern clinical decision-making is grounded in high-quality randomized controlled trials and prospective registry analyses, corroborated by seminal biomechanical and anatomical descriptions.

Clinical Question / InvestigationLevel of EvidencePivotal Landmark StudyStudy Design & MethodologyCohort Size / Follow-upPrimary Outcome / Effect SizeDOI
What is the medium-term functional natural history of isolated PCL tears managed nonoperatively?Level IVShelbourne KD, Davis TJ, Patel DV (1999)Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study133 patients (mean 5.4-year follow-up)Mean subjective score 84.2; 80% returned to pre-injury sports without significant limitation despite persistent posterior translation.DOI
Does chronic isolated PCL deficiency cause long-term disability or progressive osteoarthritis beyond 10 years?Level IVShelbourne KD, Clark M, Gray T (2013)Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study68 patients (mean 14.3-year follow-up)Mean IKDC subjective score was 86.4; knee laxity did not progress; mild degenerative changes were noted but well-tolerated.DOI
What is the diagnostic accuracy of provocative physical exam maneuvers for PCL tear?Level IRubinstein RA Jr, Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR et al (1994)Prospective Diagnostic Validation Study39 patients evaluated against arthroscopic gold standardPosterior drawer test demonstrated 90% sensitivity and 99% specificity, establishing it as the most reliable clinical exam.DOI
Does decreased posterior tibial slope increase risk of primary PCL rupture and graft failure?Level INedaie S, Vivekanantha P, O’Hara K et al (2024)Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis11 studies (1,482 knees analyzed)Flatter posterior tibial slope significantly elevates posterior shear loads, predisposing to primary rupture and reconstruction failure.DOI
What are optimal postoperative rehabilitation and bracing protocols following PCL surgery?Level ISimhal RK, Bovich M, Bahrun EA et al (2021)Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis24 studies (1,154 patients)Dynamic anterior-directed posterior-relieving bracing with quadriceps strengthening significantly mitigates residual posterior laxity.DOI

14. References

  • Shelbourne KD, Davis TJ, Patel DV. The natural history of acute, isolated, nonoperatively treated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1999. doi:10.1177/03635465990270030201 [Level IV: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study]
  • Shelbourne KD, Clark M, Gray T. Minimum 10-year follow-up of patients after an acute, isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury treated nonoperatively. Am J Sports Med. 2013. doi:10.1177/0363546513486771 [Level IV: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study]
  • Rubinstein RA Jr, Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR et al. The accuracy of the clinical examination in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1994. doi:10.1177/036354659402200419 [Level I: Prospective Diagnostic Validation Study]
  • Nedaie S, Vivekanantha P, O’Hara K et al. Decreased posterior tibial slope is a risk factor for primary posterior cruciate ligament rupture and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure: A systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024. doi:10.1002/ksa.12025 [Level I: Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis]
  • Simhal RK, Bovich M, Bahrun EA et al. Postoperative Rehabilitation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery: A Systematic Review. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021. doi:10.1097/JSA.0000000000000307 [Level I: Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis]

15. Master Class Pro-Tip

When evaluating suspected anterior knee instability, always palpate the anterior tibial step-off before initiating an anterior drawer maneuver. If the tibial plateau is already subluxated posteriorly, an apparent “anterior drawer” is merely the reduction of a sagged tibia to its neutral anatomic alignment—a classic diagnostic trap leading to erroneous ACL reconstruction in an isolated PCL injury. Intraoperatively, during transtibial PCL reconstruction, flex the knee to 90 degrees and place a posteromedial safety cannula with a curved blunt elevator strictly behind the posterior capsule; never advance a tibial guide pin or reamer without direct 70-degree endoscopic visualization of the posterior cortex exit point to guarantee popliteal vessel safety.

Master Class Surgical Pearl: Avoiding the PCL Diagnostic Trap and Protecting the Popliteal Corridor

Last Updated on September 25, 2026

🔗 Knowledge Graph & Clinical Correlates

OrthopaedicsOne Living Semantic Network

🛠️ Operative Techniques

  • Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Joint Reconstruction
  • Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty – An Option for Treating Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis Joint Reconstruction
  • Turf Toe Injuries Sports Medicine
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique Joint Reconstruction

🩺 Clinical Conditions & Indications

  • Valgus-Unloader Bracing in Knee Osteoarthritis Original Clinical Contribution: Authored for the OrthopaedicsOne Adult Reconstruction Specialty Section. Preserved, digitized, and updated to modern evidence-based...
  • Valgus deformity of the knee Valgus deformity is a term for outward angulation of the distal segment of a bone or joint. The...
  • Turf toe Introduction Despite its rather benign namesake, turf toe is a incapacitating injury that plagues many athletes who participate...
  • Total Knee Arthroplasy Protocol (Shawn Maloney) Total Knee Arthroplasy Protocol Weeks 1-2 Goals Diminish pain and swelling Increase range of motion Gait training and...

🔬 Anatomy, Pathology & Diagnostics

  • What Is the Evidence-Based Data for Gender Specific Arthroplasty in TKA Knee Joint & Extensor Mechanism
  • Warfarin – What Is Our Goal Knee Joint & Extensor Mechanism
  • Virtual Reality in Orthopaedics – Is It a Reality Knee Joint & Extensor Mechanism
  • Venous Thromboembolism – Case Presentations and Discussion Knee Joint & Extensor Mechanism

💼 Practice Management & Professional Operations

  • What Is the Evidence-Based Data for Mobile Bearing Knees Mobile and Wireless

🕸️ Semantic Relations (RDF)

ABOUT

  • Overview
  • FAQs
  • Managing Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Partners
  • Participating Groups
  • Advisory Board
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Contact Us

ARTICLES

  • Arthroscopy
  • Foot and Ankle
  • Hand and Wrist
  • Hip and Knee
  • Infection
  • Joint Reconstruction
  • Musculoskeletal Medicine
  • Pediatrics
  • Shoulder and Elbow
  • Spine
  • Sports Medicine
  • Trauma
  • Tumor

REVIEWS

  • For Residents
  • For Medical Students

EBOOKS

  • PORT Notes
  • MSK Medicine
  • Tumor Library

COMMUNITY

  • Talks
  • Images
  • Viewpoints
  • Question Bank
  • Devices

PAGES

  • Residency
  • Fellowships
  • Associations
  • Companies
Copyright © 2012-2026 OrthopaedicsOne | Privacy Policy | Dr. Christian Veillette . Powered by: OrthoNet - Empowering the Future of Orthopaedic Care
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top