Tannast M, Pfannebecker P, Schwab JM et al. Pelvic morphology differs in rotation and obliquity between developmental dysplasia of the hip and retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(12):3297-305. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2473-6.
Abstract
Background
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and acetabular retroversion represent distinct acetabular pathomorphologies. Both are associated with alterations in pelvic morphology. In cases where direct radiographic assessment of the acetabulum is difficult or impossible or in mixed cases of DDH and retroversion, additional indirect pelvimetric parameters would help identify the major underlying structural abnormality.
Questions/Purposes
We asked: How does DDH and retroversion differ with respect to rotation and coronal obliquity as measured by the pelvic width index, anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) sign, ilioischial angle, and obturator index? And what is the predictive value of each variable in detecting acetabular retroversion?
Methods
We reviewed AP pelvis radiographs for 51 dysplastic and 51 retroverted hips. Dysplasia was diagnosed based on a lateral center-edge angle of less than 20° and an acetabular index of greater than 14°. Retroversion was diagnosed based on a lateral center-edge angle of greater than 25° and concomitant presence of the crossover/ischial spine/posterior wall signs. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for each variable used to diagnose acetabular retroversion.
Results
We found a lower pelvic width index, higher prevalence of the AIIS sign, higher ilioischial angle, and lower obturator index in acetabular retroversion. The entire innominate bone is internally rotated in DDH and externally rotated in retroversion. The areas under the ROC curve were 0.969 (pelvic width index), 0.776 (AIIS sign), 0.971 (ilioischial angle), and 0.925 (obturator index).
Conclusions
Pelvic morphology is associated with acetabular pathomorphology. Our measurements, except the AIIS sign, are indirect indicators of acetabular retroversion. The data suggest they can be used when the acetabular rim is not clearly visible and retroversion is not obvious.
Level of Evidence
Level III, diagnostic study.
Last Updated on September 29, 2026
🔗 Knowledge Graph & Clinical Correlates
OrthopaedicsOne Living Semantic Network🛠️ Operative Techniques
- Woodward repair of Sprengel Deformity Pediatrics
- Valgus osteotomy for Perthes disease Pediatrics
- Triple innominate osteotomy Hip and Knee
- Traction Pediatrics
🧭 Surgical Approaches & Danger Zones
- Stoppa approach Pelvis and Acetabulum
🩺 Clinical Conditions & Indications
- Why have a practice website Original Clinical Contribution: Authored for the OrthopaedicsOne General Orthopaedics Specialty Section. Preserved, digitized, and updated to modern evidence-based...
- Torticollis Introduction Torticollis is the term used to describe the clinical findings of tilting (lateral bending) of the head/neck...
- Torn meniscus (Pediatric) 1. High-Yield Summary Superior Biological Healing Potential: Pediatric and adolescent menisci possess markedly enhanced peripheral vascularity compared to...
- Tarsal coalition Contents Introduction Anatomy Biomechanics Clinical Presentation Pathogenesis Classification (Staging) Physical Examination Imaging Conservative Treatment Operative Treatment Controversy...
🔬 Anatomy, Pathology & Diagnostics
- What Are the Factors Associated with Acetabular Correction in Perthes-like Hip Deformities Pelvis and Acetabulum
- Venography Pelvis and Acetabulum
- Urokinase Plasminogen Activator System – A Multifunction Role in Tumour Progression and Metastasis Pelvis and Acetabulum
- The Potential Research Impact of Patient Reported Outcomes on Osteogenesis Imperfecta Generalized Bone and Joint