• O1 Network
    • Articles
    • For Residents
    • For Medical Students
    • PORT Notes
    • MSK Medicine
    • Tumor Library
    • Cases
    • Talks
    • Images
    • Viewpoints
    • Question Bank
    • Devices
    • Residency
    • Fellowships
    • Associations
    • Companies
ORTHOPAEDICSONE ARTICLES
OrthopaedicsOne Articles
  • Articles
    • Specialty
      • Arthroscopy
      • Foot and Ankle
      • Hand and Wrist
      • Hip and Knee
      • Infection
      • Joint Reconstruction
      • Musculoskeletal Medicine
      • Pediatrics
      • Shoulder and Elbow
      • Spine
      • Sports Medicine
      • Trauma
      • Tumor
    • Regional
      • Anatomy
      • Basic Science
      • Classifications
      • Diagnostic Tests
      • Evidence-Based Orthopaedics
      • Operative Techniques
      • Pain Management
      • Physical Examination
      • Pharmacology
      • Radiology
      • Rehabilitation
      • Rheumatology
      • Surgical Approaches
    • Professional
      • Bioethics
      • Economics and Health Policy
      • Epidemiology and Biostatistics
      • History of Orthopaedics
      • Informatics
      • Medicolegal
      • Mobile and Wireless
      • Practice Management
  • Reviews
    • For Residents
    • For Medical Students
  • eBooks
    • PORT Notes
    • MSK Medicine
    • Tumor Library
  • Community
    • Cases
    • Talks
    • Images
    • Viewpoints
    • Question Bank
    • Devices
  • Pages
    • Residency
    • Fellowships
    • Associations
    • Companies
  • About O1
    • Overview
    • FAQs
    • Managing Editors
    • Editorial Board
    • Content Partners
    • Participating Groups
    • Advisory Board
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

How I Put In an Uncemented Tapered Femoral Stem

Faculty Operative Technique & Master Lecture: Uncemented Tapered Femoral Stem Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

1. High-Yield Summary

Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) utilizing an uncemented tapered femoral stem represents the contemporary benchmark for biological femoral reconstruction in adult hip arthroplasty. The biomechanical foundation of tapered stem fixation relies on achieving an immediate, rigid mechanical press-fit within the proximal femoral metaphysis, converting axial and torsional hip joint reaction forces into controlled radial hoop stresses against the medial calcar, anterior cortex, and lateral trochanteric column. This primary mechanical stability limits interfacial micromotion below the 40 to 150 micrometer threshold required for secondary intramembranous bone ingrowth and ongrowth. Successful clinical outcomes demand meticulous preoperative templating, complete lateral trochanteric unroofing to prevent varus deflection, and disciplined sequential compaction broaching to avoid calcar fracture.

  • Primary Clinical Indication: End-stage degenerative joint disease of the hip (primary osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, post-traumatic arthritis, and inflammatory arthropathies) in patients with supportive proximal metaphyseal bone stock and favorable femoral geometry (Dorr Type A and Type B femoral morphology).
  • Fixation Mechanism: Metaphyseal proximal wedge-fit fixation (Khanuja Type 1 single-wedge taper or Type 2 double-wedge taper) utilizing compaction broaching to preserve cancellous bone, achieving initial mechanical stability against vertical subsidence and axial rotation via cortical-cancellous interference fit, followed by secondary biological intramembranous bone ingrowth or ongrowth along porous or hydroxyapatite-coated surfaces.
  • The Single Critical Move: Mandatory lateralized entry into the trochanteric fossa with complete clearance of the lateral trochanteric overhang to eliminate varus deflection, coupled with sequential compaction broaching to achieve rigid three-dimensional proximal metaphyseal engagement without exceeding the hoop stress threshold of the medial calcar.
  • Neurovascular Danger Zones: The sciatic nerve during posterior retraction and limb positioning; the femoral nerve and femoral vessels anterior to the psoas tendon; the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve during direct anterior superficial dissection; and the ascending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery during anterior exposure.
  • Catastrophic Technical Errors to Avoid: First, undersizing the stem due to incomplete lateral trochanteric preparation or mistaking early canal resistance for cortical contact, predisposing to early postoperative subsidence (>3 mm) and rotational failure. Second, varus component malalignment resulting from a medialized entry portal, increasing interface stresses, edge loading, and femoral fracture risk. Third, aggressive broach impaction in sclerotic or osteopenic bone generating excessive hoop stress that causes unrecognized calcar splitting or longitudinal fracture propagation. Fourth, failure to recognize Dorr Type C “stovepipe” morphology, where standard collarless tapered stems carry elevated risks of subsidence and periprosthetic fracture. Fifth, incorrect femoral neck resection level resulting in limb length discrepancy or compromised femoral offset.

2. Indications

Uncemented tapered femoral stems are indicated across a wide spectrum of primary hip reconstructive procedures where proximal femoral anatomy and bone mineral density can provide stable initial mechanical purchase.

Absolute Indications

  • Primary Hip Osteoarthritis: End-stage symptomatic primary osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 3 or 4) with debilitating pain, severe functional limitation, and structural joint space obliteration refractory to non-operative treatment.
  • Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Advanced avascular necrosis of the femoral head (Ficat-Arlet Stage III or IV, Steinberg Stage IV to VI) with subchondral crescent sign, articular collapse, secondary acetabular chondral damage, and intact proximal metaphyseal bone.
  • Post-Traumatic Arthritis: Secondary osteoarthritis following acetabular fractures, femoral head fractures, or healed proximal femoral trauma where previous implants have been removed and the proximal femoral metaphysis remains biomechanically supportive.
  • Inflammatory Arthropathies: Rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus presenting with concentric joint space loss and preserved corticomedullary architecture.
  • Childhood Deformity Sequelae: Secondary degenerative arthritis resulting from developmental dysplasia of the hip (Crowe Type I or II), slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), or Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease where proximal canal geometry can accommodate a standard or modular tapered stem.

Relative Indications & Patient Selection

  • Young and Active Individuals: Patients under 65 to 70 years of age with high functional demands, where preservation of native proximal bone stock and facilitation of future revision procedures are paramount.
  • Dorr Type A and B Femoral Morphology: Femora demonstrating thick cortices and well-defined metaphyseal-diaphyseal funnels (champagne-flute or intermediate geometry) that reliably achieve rigid proximal press-fit.
  • Dorr Type C Morphology with Collared Stems: Selected older patients with osteopenic or cylindrical “stovepipe” canals where a collared tapered stem design is selected to provide calcar load transfer and counteract axial subsidence.

Contraindications

  • Active Infection: Active septic arthritis of the hip, adjacent osteomyelitis, or uncontrolled systemic bacteremia. Primary cementless implantation into an infected bed is strictly contraindicated.
  • Severe Metaphyseal Bone Deficiency: Severe proximal femoral bone loss (Paprosky Type IIB, III, or IV defects) from previous revision surgery, trauma, or severe osteolysis lacking adequate calcar and trochanteric bone support. Such cases require diaphyseal-engaging cylindrical, modular tapered fluted, or cemented revision components.
  • Extreme Dorr Type C Stovepipe Canal in Elderly Patients: Wide, cylindrical canals with paper-thin, fragile cortices and extensive intramedullary fat conversion. Collarless cementless tapered stems in this cohort demonstrate elevated risks of periprosthetic fracture and early catastrophic subsidence; cemented femoral fixation remains the international standard of care in this setting.
  • Severe Multiplanar Femoral Deformity: Uncorrected proximal femoral malunions or prior osteotomies with severe angular deformity that prevent straight axial broaching and stem insertion without cortical perforation.
  • Neuropathic Joint Disease: Charcot arthropathy or active severe neuromuscular disorders with complete loss of abductor motor function and joint proprioception.

3. Preoperative Planning

Systematic digital templating on calibrated radiographs is an indispensable prerequisite for uncemented tapered stem fixation, establishing target resection levels, predicting implant size, restoring native horizontal offset, and balancing leg lengths.

Imaging Review

  • Mandatory Radiographic Series: Calibrated anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiograph centered on the pubic symphysis with both lower extremities in 15 degrees of internal rotation to bring the femoral necks parallel to the image receptor; high-resolution AP view of the operative hip; and a true lateral radiograph (cross-table lateral or frog-leg lateral).
  • Magnification Calibration: Placement of a radiopaque spherical calibration marker of known diameter (e.g., 25.0 mm sphere) positioned at the level of the greater trochanter in the coronal plane, ensuring accurate digital software scaling.
  • Dorr Morphological Grading: Evaluation of the proximal femoral canal shape and cortical thickness on AP and lateral views. The corticomedullary index and calcar-to-canal ratio are determined to classify the bone as Dorr Type A (thick cortices, narrow isthmus), Dorr Type B (intermediate taper), or Dorr Type C (wide canal, thin cortices).
  • Femoral Neck Osteotomy Level: Measurement of the planned neck resection distance proximal to the superior border of the lesser trochanter (typically 10 to 15 mm). This osteotomy reference height matches the shoulder and calcar collar of the templated trial broach.
  • Femoral Offset & Neck-Shaft Angle: Measurement of the native femoral offset (horizontal distance from center of rotation of the femoral head to the long anatomical axis of the femur) and neck-shaft angle (coxa vara <125°, normal 125°-135°, coxa valga >135°). Selection of standard versus high-offset stem configurations to restore abductor tension without limb overlengthening.
  • Leg Length Assessment: Establishing pelvic reference lines (trans-ischial line or inter-teardrop line) to measure the vertical distance to bilateral lesser trochanters, quantifying structural leg length discrepancy.
  • Sagittal Femoral Bow Evaluation: Inspection of the lateral radiograph to identify the anterior sagittal curvature of the proximal and middle third of the femur, verifying that the distal tip of a straight tapered stem will not impinge on or perforate the anterior femoral cortex.

Equipment Checklist

  • Femoral Instrumentation: Starter box chisel, canal finder, lateralizing trochanteric punch or burr, sequential compaction broaches with quick-release handles, modular neck trials (standard and high offset options), and guided calcar planar.
  • Trial & Definitive Components: Uncemented tapered titanium femoral stems (collared and collarless options); modular femoral head trials and definitive implants (ceramic and cobalt-chromium) across multiple neck offsets (-3.5 mm, +0 mm, +3.5 mm, +7 mm); dedicated plastic-tipped head impactor.
  • Surgical Retractors: Two sharp or blunt anterior Hohmann retractors, posterior capsular retractor, superior acetabular retractor, two-pronged femoral neck elevator (Mueller retractor), and Charnley or Omni-Tract self-retaining frame.
  • Power Tools & Saws: High-energy oscillating saw with narrow and standard blades, cold sterile saline irrigation, high-speed motorized carbide burr.
  • Prophylactic Cerclage Instrumentation: Subperiosteal cable passer, 1.5-mm and 2.0-mm cobalt-chromium or titanium cerclage cables, provisional tensioner, and crimping system on standby for immediate fracture containment.

Examination Under Anesthesia

  • Passive Arc of Motion: Assessment of maximum flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, and internal/external rotation to identify fixed joint contractures.
  • Contracture Testing: Performance of the Thomas test to evaluate fixed flexion contractures, which must be addressed during soft-tissue releases and component positioning.
  • Clinical Limb Length Verification: Direct comparison of bilateral patellar levels, medial malleolar levels, and palpation of anterior superior iliac spines (ASIS) with the pelvis squared to confirm radiographic measurements prior to sterile draping.

4. Patient Positioning & Setup

Stable, reproducible patient positioning is essential to prevent spatial disorientation, ensuring accurate assessment of femoral anteversion, leg length, and pelvic tilt.

Patient Orientation & Operating Room Setup

  • Lateral Decubitus Setup (Posterior & Direct Lateral Approaches): The patient is positioned on a standard radiolucent operating table. Rigid pelvic fixation is obtained using well-padded anterior pubic and posterior sacral pegboard or clamp positioners. The operative pelvis must be secured strictly perpendicular (90 degrees) to the floor. Any inadvertent anterior or posterior pelvic tilt distorts visual version references.
  • Supine Setup (Direct Anterior Approach): The patient is positioned supine on a specialized orthopaedic traction table (e.g., Hana table) with bilateral boots or on a standard radiolucent table with a sterile draping corridor allowing hip hyperextension, adduction, and external rotation. The pelvis is leveled horizontally, ensuring both ASIS are parallel to the table.
  • Pressure Point Protection: Placement of a dedicated axillary roll positioned one handbreadth inferior to the axilla to protect the brachial plexus. The dependent peroneal nerve is protected with foam padding at the fibular head, and dependent bony prominences (malleoli, knees, trochanter) are cushioned.
  • Sterile Field Preparation: Wide prep and draping of the operative hemipelvis and lower extremity from the lower thoracic cage to the mid-calf or foot, ensuring full, unimpeded intraoperative limb mobility.

Safety Check

  • Positioner Rigidity Verification: Prior to sterile incising, firm manual pressure is applied to the pelvis in all planes to ensure complete stability without translational slippage within the clamps.
  • Range of Motion Arc Check: Confirming that the draped limb can be flexed to 90 degrees, internally rotated to 90 degrees, and adducted across the table without contacting unsterile draping poles or mayo stands.
  • Fluoroscopy Clearance: When intraoperative fluoroscopy or C-arm imaging is planned (e.g., direct anterior approach), the C-arm is brought into the field to confirm unobstructed AP pelvis and hip visualization prior to surgical draping.

5. Surgical Approaches & Internervous Planes

Uncemented tapered stems can be successfully implanted through multiple surgical approaches, each characterized by distinct internervous intervals, soft-tissue handling considerations, and exposure corridors.

Posterior Approach (Moore / Southern)

The posterior approach represents the most widely utilized corridor worldwide for primary hip arthroplasty, providing direct, unrestricted visualization of the femoral metaphysis and diaphyseal axis.

  • Superficial Interval: A curved skin incision is centered over the posterior aspect of the greater trochanter, extending proximally toward the posterior superior iliac spine and distally along the femoral shaft. The fascia lata is incised distally, and the fibers of the gluteus maximus are split bluntly along their natural orientation. There is no true intermuscular internervous plane; both halves of the split gluteus maximus muscle are innervated by the inferior gluteal nerve (L5, S1, S2).
  • Deep Dissection & External Rotator Release: The subgluteal bursa is incised, exposing the short external rotators. With the hip internally rotated, the piriformis tendon and conjoint tendon (obturator internus and gemelli) are identified, tagged with heavy stay sutures for later anatomic repair, and detached sharply from their trochanteric insertion. The quadratus femoris muscle is preserved when possible, or partially released at its superior margin to protect the ascending branch of the medial femoral circumflex artery.
  • Capsular Exposure: A posterior capsulotomy is performed as a broad, durable flap hinged medially on the acetabulum, exposing the femoral head and neck. Transosseous drill holes are placed in the posterior greater trochanter for meticulous capsulotendinous repair during closure to minimize dislocation risks.

Direct Anterior Approach (Smith-Petersen / Hueter Interval)

The direct anterior approach utilizes true intermuscular and internervous planes to access the hip joint without detaching abductor musculature.

  • Superficial Internervous Plane: The interval lies between the tensor fasciae latae (TFL), innervated by the superior gluteal nerve (L4, L5, S1), and the sartorius muscle, innervated by the femoral nerve (L2, L3, L4). The incision starts 2 cm distal and 2 cm lateral to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), directed toward the head of the fibula. Incising the fascia over the lateral half of the TFL muscle belly protects the main trunk and branches of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN).
  • Deep Internervous Plane: The deep interval lies between the tensor fasciae latae / gluteus medius laterally (superior gluteal nerve) and the rectus femoris muscle medially (femoral nerve). Retraction of the rectus femoris medially reveals the deep fascia and ascending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery.
  • Femoral Mobilization: The ascending branch (“the soldier vessels”) is coagulated or ligated. An anterior capsulotomy is performed. To deliver the femur for broaching, extensive capsular releases are required: releasing the superior and posterior capsule, along with the conjoint tendon or piriformis if necessary, combined with full hip hyperextension, adduction, and external rotation.

Direct Lateral Approach (Hardinge)

The transgluteal direct lateral approach offers excellent stability and minimal posterior dislocation risk by working anterior to the femoral neck through an abductor-splitting corridor.

  • Intermuscular Interval: A longitudinal incision is centered over the greater trochanter, splitting the fascia lata and iliotibial band. The anterior one-third of the gluteus medius and the anterior portion of the vastus lateralis are incised in continuity off the greater trochanter as a continuous sleeve, peeling the insertion off bone.
  • Internervous Plane Considerations: This is not an internervous plane. The gluteus medius is innervated by the superior gluteal nerve, and the vastus lateralis is innervated by the femoral nerve.
  • Nerve Protection: The superior gluteal nerve branches exit into the abductor muscle bellies 3 to 5 cm proximal to the tip of the greater trochanter. Splitting the gluteus medius more than 3 cm proximally risks denervating the anterior gluteus medius and tensor fascia lata, resulting in an irreversible postoperative Trendelenburg lurch.

6. Surgical Technique & Critical Moves

Implantation of an uncemented tapered femoral stem requires precise execution of sequential procedural moves, focusing on bone preservation, accurate trajectory, and balanced soft tissues.

Step 1: Femoral Neck Resection & Metaphyseal Exposure

  • Expose the entire anterior and posterior aspects of the femoral neck, identifying the base of the greater trochanter, the piriformis fossa, and the superior border of the lesser trochanter.
  • Mark the planned osteotomy line with electrocautery based on preoperative templating, typically 10 to 15 mm proximal to the superior border of the lesser trochanter, matching a 40-to-45-degree resection angle relative to the femoral shaft.
  • Resect the femoral neck using an oscillating saw under continuous chilled sterile saline irrigation to eliminate thermal osteonecrosis. The cut must proceed cleanly across the calcar femorale without creating stress-concentrating notches or cortical undercuts.
  • Extract the resected femoral head using a threaded corkscrew extractor, inspecting the articular surface for bone loss and measuring head diameter for baseline verification.
  • Deliver the proximal femur into the operative corridor. In the posterior approach, place a two-pronged femoral neck elevator (Mueller retractor) beneath the posterior neck, flexing the hip to 90 degrees, internally rotating to 90 degrees, and adducting the limb. In the direct anterior approach, hyperextend the hip 20 to 30 degrees, adduct across the contralateral leg, externally rotate to 90 degrees, and elevate the proximal femur with a dedicated bone hook.

Step 2: Canal Entry, Starter Box Preparation & Lateral Trochanteric Clearance

  • Identify the entry portal in the posterolateral aspect of the cut neck surface, at the junction of the osteotomy and the medial trochanteric wall within the trochanteric fossa.
  • Unroof the lateral trochanteric overhang using a dedicated box chisel, starter punch, or high-speed carbide burr. The master move is removing the dense superolateral cancellous and cortical bone of the greater trochanter that acts as a mechanical deflector forcing broaches into varus.
  • Clear the lateral corridor until the inner endosteal wall of the greater trochanter is directly palpated and visible.
  • Cannulate the femoral canal with a blunt starter canal finder or straight reamer directed coaxial with the femoral shaft, aiming toward the lateral femoral condyle. Advance smoothly without resistance down the central diaphyseal axis, feeling the inner cortical tube in both coronal and sagittal planes.

Step 3: Sequential Compaction Broaching & Calcar Planing

  • Select a starter broach two to three sizes smaller than the templated final implant size.
  • Orient the broach in the planned anatomical anteversion (typically 10 to 15 degrees of anteversion relative to the posterior condylar axis). Ensure the trajectory is straight down the shaft without medial tilt.
  • Compact cancellous bone using measured, coaxial mallet blows. Unlike extraction broaches, compaction broaches compress native trabecular bone into the endosteal walls, preserving an osteoconductive biological bed.
  • Progress sequentially through broach sizes. Listen carefully for acoustic feedback: the initial dull, low-pitched thud transitions to a high-pitched metallic ring as the broach engages the endosteal cortical bone of the metaphysis.
  • Assess stability at each size: apply manual rotational torque to the broach handle. If rotational toggle is palpable, advance to the next broach size.
  • Verify final broach seating: the broach achieves complete axial stability (no further vertical descent under firm mallet blows) and rotational rigidity, with the broach collar or shoulder resting at the planned resection level.
  • Plane the calcar using a dedicated guided calcar planar slipped over the broach post. Mill the medial calcar until a flat, uniform cortical shelf perpendicular to the stem axis is created, eliminating sharp bony spicules.

Step 4: Trialing, Stability, Leg Length & Combined Anteversion

  • Assemble the trial neck adapter (standard or high-offset option) and trial modular femoral head onto the seated broach.
  • Reduce the hip joint with gentle axial in-line traction, flexion, and rotation.
  • Assess stability dynamically across all physiological ranges of motion:
    • Posterior Stability: Flex the hip to 90 degrees, internally rotate to 45 to 60 degrees, and adduct 15 to 20 degrees. Confirm absence of posterior subluxation or posterior impingement. Apply an axial push force on the flexed knee (“posterior push” test).
    • Anterior Stability: Fully extend the hip, externally rotate to 40 degrees, and adduct. Ensure no anterior femoral neck impingement on the acetabular rim or anterior head subluxation.
    • Shuck / Telescoping Test: Apply firm axial traction to the extended limb; optimal soft-tissue tension demonstrates 1 to 2 mm of distraction between the femoral head and polyethylene liner.
  • Check combined anteversion: Ensure the combined cup and stem anteversion falls within the safe zone of 25 to 45 degrees (typically 15 degrees of stem anteversion + 20 degrees of cup anteversion).
  • Verify leg length and offset: Compare bilateral patellae and medial malleolar levels, reference pins, or lesser trochanter-to-center-of-rotation distances against preoperative digital templating.

Step 5: Final Stem Seating & Head Impaction

  • Dislocate the hip joint carefully without twisting or levering against the femoral cortices.
  • Remove trial components and the final broach.
  • Inspect the endosteal canal and medial calcar under bright direct illumination and cold irrigation to confirm the absolute absence of calcar cracks or microfractures.
  • Introduce the definitive uncemented tapered titanium stem, maintaining identical anatomical anteversion.
  • Impact the stem coaxially with the dedicated threaded stem impactor using controlled, disciplined mallet strikes until the stem is fully seated to the exact depth of the final broach. Confirm solid metallic resonance and complete cessation of implant advancement.
  • Clean and dry the Morse taper trunnion meticulously with a dry sponge, ensuring zero blood, fat, or particulate debris.
  • Mount the definitive femoral head (ceramic or cobalt-chromium) onto the trunnion with a gentle twist, followed by a firm, axial mallet blow using a dedicated plastic-tipped head impactor.
  • Reduce the hip joint, re-confirming stability, range of motion, and absence of impingement.
  • Repair capsulotendinous structures anatomically, executing transosseous repair of the posterior capsule and external rotators through drill holes in the greater trochanter.

The Critical Move: Achieving Three-Dimensional Proximal Wedge Fit Without Hoop Stress Fracture

The definitive biomechanical success of an uncemented tapered wedge stem hinges entirely upon obtaining rigid primary mechanical stability through three-dimensional proximal cortical engagement while actively preventing catastrophic radial hoop stress fractures. Tapered wedge stems (Khanuja Type 1 and Type 2) rely on mediolateral wedge engagement (M-L taper) and anterior-posterior wedge contact to convert axial body weight into compressive radial hoop stress.

The critical move is the continuous, vigilant surveillance of the medial calcar and anterior cortex during the final 2 to 3 millimeters of broach and stem seating, correlated with acoustic feedback and rotational toggle. As the broach advances, each mallet strike must produce a perceptible rise in acoustic pitch from a dull thud to a sharp, high-frequency metallic ring. The rate of vertical advancement per blow diminishes from 2 mm to sub-millimeter fractions.

The irreversible point of no return occurs when the broach or stem ceases to advance under firm, disciplined mallet blows. Further aggressive impaction will not seat the stem deeper; instead, the tapered geometry functions as a mechanical wedge, exceeding the ultimate tensile hoop strength of the cortical bone and instantaneously splitting the medial calcar or greater trochanter. If the stem seats 1 to 2 mm proud of the planned resection line but demonstrates absolute rotational and axial stability, the master surgeon accepts this stable position and adjusts modular head neck length accordingly, rather than risking an intraoperative periprosthetic fracture.

7. Pearls and Pitfalls

Nuanced intraoperative judgment and immediate recognition of technical pitfalls distinguish master hip surgeons and ensure long-term implant survivorship.

Surgical Pearls

  • Aggressive Lateral Trochanteric Clearance: Spend dedicated time unroofing the lateral trochanteric fossa with a box chisel or burr. The most common cause of varus stem placement is an under-prepared lateral trochanter that pushes the broach medially.
  • Acoustic Pitch Monitoring: Train the surgical ear to recognize the change in acoustic pitch during broaching. The transition from a hollow, low-frequency sound to a high-pitched ring indicates endosteal cortical contact and warns against further heavy impaction.
  • Compaction Over Excavation: Utilize compaction broaches that compress native cancellous bone into the endosteal walls rather than extracting it. This preserves the osteoconductive cancellous bed, creating a biological gasket that enhances early seal and ingrowth.
  • Offset Restoration Without Overlengthening: Use high-offset stem configurations to restore horizontal femoral offset and abductor tension without lengthening the operative limb. Restoring offset increases stability and eliminates soft-tissue laxity.
  • Prophylactic Cerclage in Fragile Bone: In elderly patients, postmenopausal women, or patients with Dorr Type C bone, place a prophylactic 1.5-mm or 2.0-mm cerclage wire around the proximal femur just below the lesser trochanter before final broaching and stem impaction. This increases cortical hoop strength and prevents crack propagation.
  • Calcar Planar Refinement: Always plane the calcar flat against the top of the seated broach. A perfectly flat calcar distributes load uniformly and prevents localized stress risers under the collar or prosthesis shoulder.

Technical Pitfalls & Rescue Maneuvers

  • Pitfall: Varus Stem Malalignment:
    Mechanism: Medialized entry portal or failure to clear the lateral trochanteric overhang, causing the broach to pivot into varus against the medial calcar.
    Rescue Maneuver: Recognize early during starter broaching. Remove the broach, aggressively re-enter the lateral trochanteric fossa with a lateralizing burr or punch, and redirect the broach laterally toward the lateral femoral condyle. Never accept a varus trajectory.
  • Pitfall: Intraoperative Calcar Hoop Stress Split:
    Mechanism: Forcing an oversized broach or continuing heavy impaction after axial advancement has stopped.
    Rescue Maneuver: Immediately remove the stem or broach. Pass a flexible cerclage passer subperiosteally around the proximal shaft distal to the lesser trochanter. Secure a 2.0-mm cable or heavy wire and tension to 40 N-m. Re-insert the broach or stem under direct visual control. If the fracture is non-displaced and stabilized with cerclage, proceed with stem insertion; if unstable, convert to a longer revision stem bypassing the crack by 2 canal diameters.
  • Pitfall: Stem Undersizing and Rotational Subsidence:
    Mechanism: Stopping broaching prematurely due to tight proximal cancellous bone or mistaking false resistance for true cortical contact.
    Rescue Maneuver: Verify rotational stability with manual toggle. If toggle exists, advance broach sizing until rigid three-point or circumferential fit is achieved. If canal morphology is wide and stovepipe (Dorr C), convert to a collared tapered stem or cemented stem.
  • Pitfall: Anterior Cortical Perforation:
    Mechanism: Failure to accommodate sagittal femoral bowing or entering with excessive posterior-to-anterior trajectory.
    Rescue Maneuver: Utilize intraoperative fluoroscopy if resistance is met early. If perforation occurs, bypass the defect by at least two femoral shaft diameters with a revision-length tapered stem and protect the defect with cerclage cables.

8. Postoperative Management & Rehabilitation

Modern postoperative management for uncemented tapered stems combines immediate full weight-bearing with multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia and structured physical therapy.

Immediate Postoperative Protocol

  • Weight-Bearing Status: Weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) with an assistive device (walker or two crutches) initiated on postoperative day 0. Immediate weight-bearing provides physiological axial compression that promotes secondary osteoblast osseointegration without increasing the risk of stem subsidence.
  • Multimodal Pain Management: Pre-emptive analgesia combining oral acetaminophen (1000 mg q8h), celecoxib (200 mg q12h) or meloxicam, gabapentinoids, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with long-acting local anesthetic (ropivacaine with epinephrine), and cryotherapy.
  • Thromboprophylaxis: Stratified chemoprophylaxis per AAOS and CHEST guidelines. Low-risk patients receive enteric-coated aspirin 81 mg twice daily for 4 to 6 weeks. High-risk patients (prior VTE, active malignancy, obesity) receive direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs, e.g., rivaroxaban or apixaban) or low-molecular-weight heparin for 35 days.
  • Early Ambulation & Discharge: Patient mobilization within 4 to 6 hours of surgery reduces cardiopulmonary complications, urinary retention, and deep venous thrombosis, enabling safe outpatient or next-day discharge.

Structured Rehabilitation Timeline

Rehabilitation PhaseTimeframePrimary Clinical GoalsPermitted Exercises & ModalitiesPrecautions & Milestones
Phase I: Acute Protection & ActivationWeeks 0 to 2Edema control, safe transfers, quad activation, independent ambulation with walker.Ankle pumps, isometric quadriceps sets, gluteal sets, heel slides, assisted straight leg raises.WBAT with walker/crutches; approach precautions (posterior: no flexion >90°, adduction past midline, internal rotation).
Phase II: Gait Normalization & EnduranceWeeks 2 to 6Wean to single cane, normalize symmetrical gait pattern, improve pelvic stability.Stationary cycling with light resistance, terminal knee extensions, mini-squats, side-lying hip abduction.Discontinue walker; advance to unassisted ambulation when Trendelenburg sign resolves.
Phase III: Dynamic Strengthening & BalanceWeeks 6 to 12Restore full active range of motion, muscle hypertrophy, proprioceptive retraining.Closed-chain leg press, step-ups, single-leg balance exercises, resistance band lateral walks, elliptical.Full unassisted ambulation; no assistive devices; return to driving when off opioids.
Phase IV: Functional Return & Athletics>12 WeeksLong-term bone remodeling, return to low-impact sports and occupational activities.Swimming, doubles tennis, golf, road cycling, hiking, progressive resistance gym training.Avoid high-impact jumping and contact sports; annual clinical and radiographic follow-up.

9. Expected Outcomes & Long-Term Survivorship

Uncemented tapered femoral stems demonstrate outstanding clinical success and reproducible implant survivorship across multiple international registries and multi-decade cohort studies. Long-term survivorship free from aseptic loosening routinely exceeds 95% to 99% at 10 to 30 years of clinical follow-up.

Longitudinal radiographic evaluations confirm predictable secondary biological fixation by osseointegration. Proximal porous and hydroxyapatite coatings demonstrate dense cancellous condensation and spot welds in Gruen zones 1, 2, 6, and 7. The tapered geometry promotes physiological load transfer to the proximal metaphysis, resulting in significantly lower rates of proximal stress shielding compared to extensively porous-coated cylindrical stems.

Patient-reported outcome measures, including the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Oxford Hip Score, and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), show marked and durable improvements. Mean postoperative Harris Hip Scores consistently surpass 90 to 95 points. Furthermore, the incidence of mid-thigh pain with tapered titanium stems is exceptionally low (1.0% to 1.6%), contrasting sharply with rigid diaphyseal-engaging cylindrical designs (7.0% to 10.0%), owing to the lower Young’s modulus of titanium alloy and the absence of distal diaphyseal stem binding.

10. Complications & Risk Mitigation

Complications associated with uncemented tapered femoral stems can be avoided through strict surgical technique and structured salvage protocols.

ComplicationReported Incidence / Risk FactorsPathophysiologic MechanismIntraoperative Prevention & Avoidance StrategyDiagnostic Workup & Salvage Algorithm
Intraoperative Calcar Fracture1.5% to 3.5%; osteopenia, Dorr Type A bone, aggressive broaching, varus trajectory.Excessive radial hoop tensile stresses generated during broaching or final stem impaction exceeding cortical hoop strength.Clear lateral trochanteric overhang; monitor acoustic pitch; use prophylactic cerclage wire in high-risk bone.Direct visualization; place 1.5-mm or 2.0-mm cerclage cable distal to crack; ensure stable seating.
Early Stem Subsidence (>3 mm)0.5% to 2.0%; undersized stem, Dorr Type C bone, unrecognized rotational toggle.Insufficient primary frictional interference fit and failure of rotational stability under early axial body weight.Progress broaches until rotational toggle is eliminated; consider collared stem or cemented stem in Dorr C.Serial radiographs. If subsidence stabilizes <5 mm without pain, monitor. Progressive migration: revision THA.
Varus Stem Malalignment1.5% to 4.0%; obesity, inadequate lateral exposure, tight abductor musculature.Failure to unroof lateral trochanter; broach is pushed medially by trochanteric overhang into varus tilt.Aggressive lateral box chisel preparation; enter coaxial with shaft aiming at lateral femoral condyle.Postoperative radiographs confirm varus alignment. Asymptomatic: observe. If symptomatic or edge-loading: revision.
Postoperative Periprosthetic Fracture0.8% to 2.2%; low-energy falls, elderly female patients, collarless stems, osteoporosis.Torsional or bending load overcoming osteoporotic bone around a rigid wedge-fit stem (Vancouver B1 or B2).Careful patient selection; use collared stems in osteoporotic bone; consider cemented stems in Dorr C.AP and lateral radiographs/CT. Vancouver B1: ORIF with locking plate and cables. Vancouver B2: revision with fluted tapered stem.
Hip Dislocation / Instability0.8% to 2.5%; component malversion, abductor deficiency, soft-tissue laxity, noncompliance.Impingement between neck and cup liner, or loss of myofascial tension leading to head levering out of cup.Verify combined anteversion (25°-45°); optimize femoral offset; perform meticulous capsulotendinous repair.Closed reduction under conscious sedation. Recurrent instability: CT to evaluate version; revise head/liner or dual-mobility.
Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Injury2.0% to 15.0% (DAA specific); excessive traction, medial incision placement.Direct transection or traction injury to the main trunk or sartorial branches of LFCN during anterior approach.Place incision >2 cm lateral and distal to ASIS; incise fascia over lateral half of TFL belly; avoid aggressive retractor levering.Clinical exam reveals anterolateral thigh numbness/burning (meralgia paresthetica). 90% resolve spontaneously; reassure patient.
Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI)0.5% to 1.2%; diabetes, obesity, smoking, prolonged operative time.Bacterial inoculation and biofilm formation on prosthetic metallic and polyethylene surfaces.Laminar air flow, prophylactic IV antibiotics within 60 minutes of incision, dilute betadine lavage, watertight closure.Serum ESR, CRP, joint aspiration (cell count, alpha-defensin, culture). Acute (<4 wks): DAIR. Chronic: 2-stage exchange.

11. Classification of Cementless Femoral Stems & Morphologic Host Bone

Understanding cementless stem design taxonomy and host bone morphology is critical for selecting the optimal implant geometry and anticipating intraoperative behavior.

Khanuja Stem ClassificationDesign Morphology & Taper GeometryPrimary Fixation ZoneBiomechanical CharacteristicsClinical Indications & Examples
Type 1: Single-Wedge TaperTapered in mediolateral (M-L) plane only; flat, narrow profile in anterior-posterior (A-P) plane.Metaphyseal (M-L cortical wedge contact).Forgiving in narrow A-P canals; low modulus mismatch; relies on three-point M-L press-fit.Standard primary THA; Dorr Type A and B bone. Examples: Taperloc, Accolade II, Anthology.
Type 2: Double-Wedge TaperTapered in both M-L and A-P planes (dual-taper); proximal trapezoidal or rounded geometry.Metaphyseal (circumferential metaphyseal contact).High torsional and axial stability; compaction broaching preserves cancellous bed; optional collar.Primary THA across diverse bone types; Dorr A, B, and select C. Examples: Corail, Quadra, Summit.
Type 3: Tapered Rectangular / ConicalRectangular cross-section (Zweymüller-type) or conical fluted geometry with longitudinal ribs.Metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction.Four-point cortical corner contact; high rotational resistance; bypasses proximal calcar defects.Dysplastic femora, straight narrow canals, complex primary THA. Examples: Alloclassic, Wagner Cone.
Type 4: Cylindrical Fully CoatedStraight cylindrical stem with extensive circumferential porous coating (sintered beads/mesh).Diaphyseal isthmus (>4 to 6 cm scratch-fit).Rigid scratch-fit in isthmus; high axial/torsional stability; risks proximal stress shielding and thigh pain.Revision THA with Paprosky Type I-IIIA defects; Dorr Type B/C bone. Examples: AML, Solution.
Type 5: Modular StemsModular metaphyseal sleeve/cone and separate diaphyseal stem, or modular neck junctions.Independent metaphyseal and diaphyseal zones.Decouples version, offset, and leg length from stem diameter; addresses complex multiplanar deformities.Severe proximal dysmorphism, high hip dislocations, revision THA. Examples: S-ROM, MP revision.
Type 6: Anatomical StemsCurved stem geometry matching sagittal anterior bow; anteverted proximal neck and coronal flare.Metaphyseal and proximal diaphyseal fit.Anatomical load distribution; requires side-specific right/left implants; less forgiving to malposition.Primary THA with pronounced anterior bow. Examples: SPS, ABG II.

The Dorr classification system categorizes proximal femoral geometry and cortical structural density, providing the definitive guide for cementless stem suitability.

Dorr Femoral Bone TypeCortical Wall CharacteristicsCanal Morphology & Isthmus RatioHistomorphometry & QualityCementless Tapered Stem Behavior & Strategy
Type A (“Champagne Flute”)Thick, dense anterior, posterior, and medial cortices; narrow diaphyseal canal.Funnel-shaped metaphysis with high calcar-to-isthmus ratio; narrow isthmic tube.Dense haversian bone; high cellularity; low fatty marrow substitution.Exceptional primary stability; elevated hoop stress fracture risk during broaching; mandatory lateralization.
Type B (“Intermediate”)Moderate cortical thickness; gradual thinning of posterior cortex.Intermediate taper from metaphysis to diaphysis; standard corticomedullary ratio.Compromised structural density; preserved endosteal trabecular architecture.Ideal indication for cementless tapered wedge stems; reliable compaction broaching and osseointegration.
Type C (“Stovepipe”)Paper-thin, porous cortices; wide cylindrical canal with loss of endosteal definition.Cylindrical “stovepipe” canal with wide isthmus; loss of metaphyseal-diaphyseal taper.Extensive trabecular resorption; fatty marrow conversion; high cortical porosity.High risk of subsidence and periprosthetic fracture; use collared tapered stem, compaction broach, or cemented stem.

12. Neurovascular Danger Zones & Structures at Risk

Surgical exposure and femoral instrumentation place major peripheral nerves and vascular conduits at risk of traction, compression, and direct mechanical laceration.

Sciatic Nerve (Peroneal and Tibial Divisions)

The sciatic nerve exits the greater sciatic notch inferior to the piriformis muscle and courses anterior to the gluteus maximus along the posterior surface of the short external rotators. The peroneal division, located along the posterior and lateral aspect of the nerve bundle, is exceptionally vulnerable to traction injury during limb lengthening and direct compression from posterior acetabular retractors. Protection requires tagging and reflecting the piriformis and conjoint tendons posteriorly to serve as a protective soft-tissue buffer, keeping retractors strictly within the capsular sleeve, and flexing the knee during hip extension and traction maneuvers.

Femoral Neurovascular Bundle & Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve

The femoral artery, femoral vein, and femoral nerve lie immediately anterior to the hip capsule, separated only by the iliopsoas muscle and tendon. Anterior Hohmann retractors that penetrate through the iliopsoas or slip off the anterior acetabular rim can lacerate the femoral vessels or cause femoral nerve neuropraxia. Retractors must be placed directly onto bone deep to the capsule under direct vision. In the direct anterior approach, the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) crosses the sartorius muscle close to the ASIS; incising the superficial fascia at least 2 cm lateral to the ASIS over the lateral half of the tensor fasciae latae belly protects the main trunk and branches.

Superior Gluteal Nerve

The superior gluteal nerve and vessels exit the greater sciatic notch superior to the piriformis muscle and travel laterally between the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus muscles, supplying motor innervation to the gluteus medius, gluteus minimus, and tensor fasciae latae. In the direct lateral (Hardinge) approach, proximal splitting of the gluteus medius muscle belly must not extend more than 3 to 5 cm proximal to the tip of the greater trochanter. Extending the split beyond this safe corridor denervates the anterior abductor muscle mass, producing a permanent, debilitating Trendelenburg gait.

Medial Circumflex Femoral Artery

The medial circumflex femoral artery (MCFA) courses posteromedially around the femoral neck and gives off deep ascending branches that provide the primary arterial blood supply to the femoral head. During the posterior approach, aggressive dissection distal to the quadratus femoris can transect the main branch of the MCFA, resulting in brisk arterial hemorrhage and retroperitoneal hematoma formation. Dissection should remain strictly proximal to the inferior border of the quadratus femoris. In the anterior approach, the ascending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery (“the soldier vessels”) crosses the intermuscular interval and must be identified and ligated prior to capsular exposure.

13. Evidence-Based Synthesis

Modern clinical decision-making is grounded in high-quality randomized controlled trials and prospective registry analyses, corroborated by seminal biomechanical and anatomical descriptions.

Clinical Question / InvestigationLevel of EvidencePivotal Landmark StudyStudy Design & MethodologyCohort Size / Follow-upPrimary Outcome / Effect SizeDOI
What is the 5-year fixation stability and proximal femoral bone remodeling of taper-wedge stems on RSA and DXA?Level IJørgensen PB, Homilius M, Koppens D et al (2025)Randomized Controlled Trial50 patients (50 hips) randomized to taper-wedge vs round-tapered stem, 5-year follow-up with RSA and DXABoth designs demonstrated excellent, stable proximal fixation at 5 years with minimal migration (<0.2 mm); taper-wedge stems showed significantly less metaphyseal bone loss in Gruen zones 1 and 7.DOI
Does implant metallurgy affect clinical outcomes and bone remodeling in tapered wedge stems?Level IHealy WL, Tilzey JF, Iorio R et al (2009)Randomized Controlled Trial100 consecutive primary THAs randomized to titanium vs CoCr tapered wedge stems, 5-year follow-up100% stem survivorship with radiographic bone ingrowth in both cohorts; titanium tapered stems demonstrated lower incidence of thigh pain and preserved proximal femoral bone density.DOI
How does proximal porous-coated tapered fixation compare to fully coated cylindrical fixation?Level IMacDonald SJ, Rosenzweig S, Guerin JS et al (2010)Randomized Controlled Trial379 primary THAs randomized to proximally tapered porous-coated vs extensively fully coated stems, 5-year follow-upComparable 5-year implant survivorship (>98%); proximally coated tapered stems demonstrated significantly reduced distal thigh pain (1.6% vs 7.2%) and significantly less proximal stress shielding.DOI
What are the biomechanical fixation mechanisms and classification of cementless femoral stems?Level IVKhanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS et al (2011)Landmark Review & Classification SystemComprehensive evidence synthesis across 6 distinct cementless stem morphotypes (Types 1-6)Established the gold standard classification of cementless stems; defined Type 1 (single-taper wedge), Type 2 (double-taper wedge / dual-taper), and Type 3 (tapered rectangular/conical), confirming excellent long-term fixation across diverse femoral geometries.DOI
What is the ultra-long-term (>30-year) survivorship and stability of uncemented tapered titanium stems?Level IVMcLaughlin JR, Johnson MA, Lee KR (2023)Landmark Longitudinal Cohort Study115 primary THAs in young patients evaluated at minimum 30-year follow-up (mean 32.4 years)97.4% 30-year stem survivorship free of revision for aseptic loosening; durable proximal osseointegration and stable radiographic bone remodeling over three decades.DOI
What is the 10-to-14 year clinical survivorship and osseointegration of flat tapered wedge stems?Level IVParvizi J, Keisu KS, Hozack WJ et al (2004)Landmark Retrospective Cohort Study145 primary THAs with an uncemented tapered titanium wedge stem, followed for 10 to 14 years99.3% stem survivorship for aseptic loosening at 10 to 14 years; 98.6% achieved stable bone ingrowth with zero progressive distal osteolysis.DOI
How does cementless tapered stem design and collar presence impact periprosthetic fracture risk?Level IIIBouché PA, Lübbeke A, Brand C et al (2026)National Registry Comparative Cohort Study182,118 primary THAs from the Swiss National Joint Registry evaluating intra- and postoperative periprosthetic fracturesUncemented collarless tapered stems carried higher early periprosthetic fracture risk in elderly and osteoporotic femurs compared to collared tapered stems and cemented stems; collared tapered designs significantly reduced fracture revision hazard (HR 0.58).DOI

14. References

  • Jørgensen PB, Homilius M, Koppens D et al. Similar femoral stem fixation but less metaphyseal loss of bone mineral density with a taper-wedge design and diaphyseal bone preservation with a long and round-tapered design: a 5-year randomized RSA and DXA study of 50 patients. Acta Orthop. 2025. doi:10.2340/17453674.2025.43907 [Level I: Randomized Controlled Trial]
  • Healy WL, Tilzey JF, Iorio R et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of cobalt-chrome and titanium trilock femoral stems. J Arthroplasty. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.035 [Level I: Randomized Controlled Trial]
  • MacDonald SJ, Rosenzweig S, Guerin JS et al. Proximally versus fully porous-coated femoral stems: a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1092-3 [Level I: Randomized Controlled Trial]
  • Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS et al. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.00774 [Level IV: Landmark Review & Classification System]
  • McLaughlin JR, Johnson MA, Lee KR. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a tapered titanium femoral component: a minimum 30-year follow-up. Bone Jt Open. 2023. doi:10.1302/2633-1462.42.BJO-2022-0142.R1 [Level IV: Landmark Longitudinal Cohort Study]
  • Parvizi J, Keisu KS, Hozack WJ et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component: a long-term study of the Taperloc stem. J Arthroplasty. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2003.10.003 [Level IV: Landmark Retrospective Cohort Study]
  • Bouché PA, Lübbeke A, Brand C et al. Impact of Stem Design on Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Risk: Findings from 182,118 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties in the Swiss National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2026. doi:10.2106/JBJS.25.01203 [Level III: National Registry Comparative Cohort Study]

15. Master Class Pro-Tip

The definitive secret to reproducible success with an uncemented tapered wedge femoral stem is governed by two unyielding technical imperatives: aggressive lateralization and acoustic vigilance. First, the most common error leading to varus stem malalignment and calcar fracture is failure to adequately unroof the lateral trochanteric shoulder; the dense cancellous overhang of the greater trochanter acts as a mechanical deflector that kicks every broach into varus. Always use a dedicated box chisel or high-speed burr to clear the trochanteric fossa until the lateral endosteal cortex is directly visible and palpated, allowing the broach to enter coaxially toward the lateral femoral condyle. Second, listen obsessively to the changing acoustic pitch during final compaction broaching. As the broach advances, the initial low-frequency thud transforms into a crisp, high-frequency metallic ring that signals intimate cortical engagement. When this acoustic transition occurs and the broach ceases to advance under measured mallet blows, stop immediately. Never attempt to force a proud broach or stem down with heavier blows; the tapered wedge geometry generates exponential radial hoop stresses that will instantly split an osteopenic calcar. If the implant seats 1 to 2 millimeters proud but exhibits complete rotational and axial rigidity, accept the stable proximal purchase and restore exact leg length with modular neck selections. Axial stability must never be purchased at the cost of cortical fracture.

Master Class Surgical Pearl: Uncemented Tapered Femoral Stem Fixation

Last Updated on September 23, 2026

🔗 Knowledge Graph & Clinical Correlates

OrthopaedicsOne Living Semantic Network

🛠️ Operative Techniques

  • Valgus osteotomy for Perthes disease Pediatrics
  • Valgus osteotomy for development coxa vara Hip and Knee

🩺 Clinical Conditions & Indications

  • Which EMR should I choose Original Clinical Contribution: Authored for the OrthopaedicsOne General Orthopaedics Specialty Section. Preserved, digitized, and updated to modern evidence-based...

🔬 Anatomy, Pathology & Diagnostics

  • Why I Would Not Consider Navigating My THA Hip Joint & Proximal Femur
  • Why I Would Consider Navigating My THA Hip Joint & Proximal Femur
  • Why I Use Metal on Metal Hip Joint & Proximal Femur
  • Why I Use Cross-Linked Polyethylene Hip Joint & Proximal Femur

🕸️ Semantic Relations (RDF)

ABOUT

  • Overview
  • FAQs
  • Managing Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Partners
  • Participating Groups
  • Advisory Board
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Contact Us

ARTICLES

  • Arthroscopy
  • Foot and Ankle
  • Hand and Wrist
  • Hip and Knee
  • Infection
  • Joint Reconstruction
  • Musculoskeletal Medicine
  • Pediatrics
  • Shoulder and Elbow
  • Spine
  • Sports Medicine
  • Trauma
  • Tumor

REVIEWS

  • For Residents
  • For Medical Students

EBOOKS

  • PORT Notes
  • MSK Medicine
  • Tumor Library

COMMUNITY

  • Talks
  • Images
  • Viewpoints
  • Question Bank
  • Devices

PAGES

  • Residency
  • Fellowships
  • Associations
  • Companies
Copyright © 2012-2026 OrthopaedicsOne | Privacy Policy | Dr. Christian Veillette . Powered by: OrthoNet - Empowering the Future of Orthopaedic Care
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top