• O1 Network
    • Articles
    • For Residents
    • For Medical Students
    • PORT Notes
    • MSK Medicine
    • Tumor Library
    • Cases
    • Talks
    • Images
    • Viewpoints
    • Question Bank
    • Devices
    • Residency
    • Fellowships
    • Associations
    • Companies
ORTHOPAEDICSONE ARTICLES
OrthopaedicsOne Articles
  • Articles
    • Specialty
      • Arthroscopy
      • Foot and Ankle
      • Hand and Wrist
      • Hip and Knee
      • Infection
      • Joint Reconstruction
      • Musculoskeletal Medicine
      • Pediatrics
      • Shoulder and Elbow
      • Spine
      • Sports Medicine
      • Trauma
      • Tumor
    • Regional
      • Anatomy
      • Basic Science
      • Classifications
      • Diagnostic Tests
      • Evidence-Based Orthopaedics
      • Operative Techniques
      • Pain Management
      • Physical Examination
      • Pharmacology
      • Radiology
      • Rehabilitation
      • Rheumatology
      • Surgical Approaches
    • Professional
      • Bioethics
      • Economics and Health Policy
      • Epidemiology and Biostatistics
      • History of Orthopaedics
      • Informatics
      • Medicolegal
      • Mobile and Wireless
      • Practice Management
  • Reviews
    • For Residents
    • For Medical Students
  • eBooks
    • PORT Notes
    • MSK Medicine
    • Tumor Library
  • Community
    • Cases
    • Talks
    • Images
    • Viewpoints
    • Question Bank
    • Devices
  • Pages
    • Residency
    • Fellowships
    • Associations
    • Companies
  • About O1
    • Overview
    • FAQs
    • Managing Editors
    • Editorial Board
    • Content Partners
    • Participating Groups
    • Advisory Board
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Revision TKA with Extensor Mechanism Repair

1. High-Yield Summary

Disruption of the knee extensor mechanism in the setting of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a catastrophic complication that severely compromises ambulatory function, joint stability, and quality of life. The clinical presentation encompasses quadriceps tendon avulsion, patellar body fracture with nonunion or displacement, patellar tendon rupture, and complete disruption of host tissue following severe infection or multiple prior revisions.

  • Primary Clinical Indication: Complete loss of active knee extension, disabling extensor lag (>20–30°), progressive knee buckling, or catastrophic soft-tissue disruption following primary or revision TKA.
  • Critical Procedural Move: Rigid initial fixation of the reconstructive construct (synthetic polypropylene mesh or fresh-frozen extensor mechanism allograft) to the host proximal tibia, followed by maximal tensioning in full 0° terminal knee extension (or slight hyperextension) prior to final proximal suturing.
  • Catastrophic Error to Avoid: Attempting an isolated direct primary end-to-end suture repair without robust structural augmentation in revision knee arthroplasty, which carries a historic failure rate exceeding 35–40%, or tensioning the reconstruction with the knee in flexion, guaranteeing chronic debilitating extensor lag.

2. Indications

Reconstructive repair of the extensor mechanism during revision TKA is indicated when discontinuity between the rectus femoris muscle belly and the tibial tubercle prevents functional weight-bearing and terminal knee extension.

Absolute Indications

  • Complete disruption of the patellar tendon or quadriceps tendon with inability to perform an active straight leg raise and an extensor lag greater than 20–30°.
  • Displaced transverse patellar fracture (Goldberg Type II) with disrupted retinacula, extensor discontinuity, and loose or mechanically compromised patellar prosthetic components.
  • Chronic, attenuated extensor mechanism following resection arthroplasty, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) debridement, or failed previous repair attempts.

Relative Indications

  • Partial extensor rupture with progressive, symptomatic extensor lag and recurrent knee instability during ambulation in an active patient.
  • Extensor disruption presenting concomitantly with aseptic component loosening, profound osteolysis, or severe joint line malposition requiring comprehensive component revision.

Contraindications

  • Active, Untreated Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI): Reconstruction using synthetic mesh or structural allograft in an infected field results in reinfection and catastrophic construct failure. PJI must be definitively eradicated (negative synovial markers, negative cultures, staged revision) prior to extensor reconstruction.
  • Compromised Anterior Soft-Tissue Envelope: Severe skin necrosis, active wound breakdown, or extensive irradiated cutaneous tissue precluding tension-free primary skin closure without staged soft-tissue coverage (e.g., gastrocnemius rotational flap).
  • Severe Medical Comorbidities or Non-Ambulatory Status: Patients who are non-ambulatory, bedbound, or lack motor function in the femoral nerve or quadriceps musculature derive minimal benefit from complex reconstruction; knee arthrodesis, hinged bracing, or above-knee amputation may represent safer palliative alternatives.

3. Preoperative Planning

Successful management requires a meticulous preoperative evaluation of implant stability, patellofemoral tracking, joint line position, and host bone inventory.

Imaging Review

  • Radiographic Evaluation: High-quality full-length standing anteroposterior (AP), true lateral (in 30° flexion and extension), and Merchant or Sunrise skyline views. Measure the Insall-Salvati and Caton-Deschamps ratios to detect patella alta (patellar tendon rupture) or patella baja (quadriceps rupture or previous joint line elevation).
  • Joint Line Assessment: Quantify the distance from the fibular head to the joint line (normal 12–15 mm) and medial epicondyle to joint line (normal 25–30 mm). Joint line elevation (pseudo-patella baja) increases anterior shear loads and pre-disposes the repair to mechanical failure.
  • Computed Tomography (CT) Scan: Axial, coronal, and sagittal reconstructions with metal artifact reduction to assess rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial components (internal rotation increases lateral patellar vector stresses) and quantify tibial tubercle bone stock.
  • Infection Exclusion: Mandatory ESR, CRP, and synovial aspiration (total cell count, neutrophil differential, alpha-defensin, aerobic/anaerobic cultures) to rule out occult PJI before committing to large foreign body implantation.

Equipment Checklist

  • Reconstruction Construct Options: Monofilament polypropylene mesh (e.g., Marlex mesh, folded into 8–10 layers) or high-density polyethylene/polyester tape; fresh-frozen complete extensor mechanism allograft (tibial tubercle bone block, patellar tendon, patella, and quadriceps tendon).
  • Bone Fixation Hardware: 3.5 mm / 4.5 mm cortical screws, washers, small fragment pelvic reconstruction plates, cerclage cables or heavy braided non-absorbable tape (#5 Ethibond, FiberWire, or TigerTape).
  • Revision Arthroplasty Instrumentation: Revision knee extraction sets, augments, modular stems, semi-constrained (condylar constrained knee – CCK) or rotating hinge knee (RHK) systems if collateral deficiency or severe joint imbalance coexists.
  • High-Speed Burr & Bone Cement: High-speed pencil burr (e.g., Midas Rex) for preparing the tibial bone trough and antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) for tibial cementation.

Examination Under Anesthesia (EUA)

  • Palpate the entire extensor envelope from the quadriceps tendon insertion to the tibial tubercle to locate the precise level of discontinuity.
  • Assess passive knee flexion, patellar mobility, and collateral ligament stability to plan required constraint and implant revision steps.

4. Patient Positioning & Setup

The patient is positioned supine on a radiolucent operating table. A pneumatic tourniquet is placed around the proximal thigh; however, it should remain uninflated during exposure whenever possible or deflated before extensor tensioning to avoid tethering the quadriceps muscle belly against the anterior femur.

  • A sterile lateral thigh support and foot positioner allow stable flexion between 0° and 120°.
  • All bony prominences, including the contralateral leg, sacrum, and peroneal nerve at the fibular head, are carefully padded.
  • Sterile surgical prep must extend widely from the iliac crest and groin down to the toes to permit proximal extensile quadriceps mobilization and distal exposure to the tibial shaft.

Safety Check

Verify that the C-arm fluoroscope can enter the operative field orthogonally to obtain clear intraoperative AP and lateral views of the joint line, tibial tubercle trough, and revision hardware.

5. Approach

The surgical approach utilizes the previous anterior midline incision, incorporating the most lateral usable scar if multiple previous incisions are present to preserve medial genicular blood supply.

  • Extensile Midline Exposure: Incision begins 8–10 cm proximal to the superior patellar pole and extends distally 5–8 cm past the tibial tubercle along the anterior medial tibial crest. Full-thickness fasciocutaneous flaps are mobilized without undermining superficial subcutaneous tissue.
  • Arthrotomy: A medial parapatellar arthrotomy is developed carefully through scar tissue. If the extensor mechanism is scarred or contracted, extensive intra-articular and suprapatellar adhesiolysis is performed. Never forcibly evert an attenuated patella or avulse an already compromised extensor mechanism.
  • Internervous Plane: There is no true internervous plane across the anterior knee. Dissection remains midline within the tendon fibers. The infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve is inevitably sacrificed, while the terminal trunk of the saphenous nerve and femoral nerve innervation to vastus medialis must be protected medially. Lateral dissection must avoid posterolateral dissection below the joint line to protect the common peroneal nerve.

6. Technique

Reconstruction follows a disciplined, step-by-step pathway addressing implant revision, joint line restoration, and stable anatomical extensor reconstruction.

Step 1: Exposure and Soft-Tissue Mobilization

Mobilize the soft-tissue envelope extensively. Release tight fibrous adhesions in the medial and lateral gutters and dissect the suprapatellar quadriceps tendon free from the anterior femoral cortex. Debride necrotic scar tissue and fibrous pseudocapsule at the tear margin, identifying healthy, bleeding collagenous tissue edges for host-graft incorporation.

Step 2: Component & Host Bone Assessment

Inspect the existing femoral, tibial, and patellar components. Assess component fixation, stability, and rotational alignment. If components are loose, malrotated, or the joint line is elevated, perform component revision before extensor reconstruction. Restore the anatomical joint line using distal femoral augments; an elevated joint line increases tension on the reconstruction and precipitates early construct failure.

Step 3: Reconstruction Options

Select the reconstructive archetype based on patient age, host tissue quality, and implant availability:

  • Synthetic Mesh Reconstruction (Marlex / Polypropylene): Prepare a wide sheet of knitted monofilament polypropylene mesh folded longitudinally into an 8- to 10-layer construct (measuring approximately 3–4 cm wide and 25–30 cm long). Synthetic mesh offers low biological immunogenicity, eliminates allograft disease transmission risk, resists stretch attenuation, and achieves predictable fibrous tissue ingrowth.
  • Extensor Mechanism Allograft: Thaw the fresh-frozen whole extensor construct. The allograft includes a 4–5 cm tapered tibial bone block containing the intact tibial tubercle, patellar tendon, patella, and quadriceps tendon tendon cuff. Shape the tibial block with a micro-sagittal saw into a dovetailed wedge.
  • Primary Direct Repair with Augmentation: Reserved solely for acute, traumatic avulsions in low-demand patients with excellent tissue quality. Must be augmented with braided non-absorbable high-strength tape or synthetic mesh to protect the repair during early motion.

Step 4: Fixation, Tensioning & Soft-Tissue Coverage

Execute rigid distal fixation followed by terminal extension tensioning:

  • Distal Tibial Fixation (Synthetic Mesh): Create a 3 cm longitudinal trough in the anterior proximal tibia distal to the tibial baseplate using an oscillating saw and burr. Anchor the distal end of the mesh into the trough with antibiotic-loaded PMMA bone cement, reinforced with 2–3 cortical screws and spiked washers into the tibial cortex.
  • Distal Tibial Fixation (Allograft Bone Block): Prepare a matching dovetailed slot in the host tibial tubercle. Press-fit the graft bone block into the host trough, maintaining flush anterior cortical contact. Secure with two bicortical 3.5 mm or 4.5 mm cortical screws with washers or a small fragment neutralization plate.
  • Proximal Weave and Maximal Extension Tensioning: Completely deflate the pneumatic tourniquet prior to tensioning to eliminate quadriceps binding against the femur. Place the knee in full 0° extension (or 5° hyperextension). Pass the synthetic mesh or allograft quadriceps tendon through or underneath host extensor remnants, apply maximal manual axial tension using heavy clamps, and secure to vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, and rectus femoris with multiple heavy, non-absorbable interrupted braided sutures (#2 or #5 FiberWire) in a modified Pulvertaft or interlocking mattress pattern.
  • Host Envelope Closure: Mobilize remnant host retinaculum and anterior pseudocapsule over the reconstructive graft to ensure vascularized soft-tissue coverage and avoid subcutaneous hardware prominence.

Critical Move

The irreversible procedural step is tensioning the proximal construct in absolute terminal extension (0°) with maximum manual force. Any residual laxity accepted on the operating table will inevitably stretch out postoperatively under gravity and quadriceps loading, resulting in a persistent, disabling extensor lag.

7. Pearls and Pitfalls

Pearls

  • Deflate Tourniquet Prior to Proximal Weave: Tourniquet inflation anchors the quadriceps muscle against the mid-diaphysis of the femur. Releasing the tourniquet allows the muscle belly to reach its true physiological resting excursion before suturing.
  • Restore the Joint Line First: Never reconstruct the extensor mechanism over an elevated joint line. Use distal femoral augments to bring the femoral component down to the anatomical level, preventing pseudo-patella baja and excessive strain on the repair.
  • Subcutaneous Mesh Coverage: Always close host retinacular and subcutaneous layers over the synthetic mesh. If the anterior skin is paper-thin, plan a medial gastrocnemius rotational flap concomitantly to ensure robust biological vascular coverage.
  • Multi-Layer Mesh Compaction: Fold the polypropylene mesh into 8–10 layers. A thin 2-layer mesh will fray and fail under cyclic tensile fatigue.

Pitfalls

  • Isolated Suture Repair: Attempting primary direct repair of a ruptured patellar tendon in a revision TKA setting without synthetic or allograft reconstruction leads to failure in over one-third of patients.
  • Under-Tensioning the Graft: Tensioning with the knee in 30° or 45° of flexion guarantees a postoperative extensor lag of 30° to 50°, producing knee buckling and fall risk.
  • Tibial Tubercle Fracture: Aggressive trough creation with an osteotome can propagate a fracture into the anterior tibial diaphysis. Use high-speed burrs with irrigation and pre-drill screw holes.
  • Common Peroneal Nerve Traction: In patients with longstanding severe flexion contractures or valgus deformities, forceful extension after reconstruction can cause acute peroneal traction neurapraxia.

8. Postoperative Care

Immediate

  • Immobilization: Strict knee immobilization in a locked extension brace or cylinder cast at 0° for 6–8 weeks.
  • Weight-Bearing: Weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) with the knee locked rigidly in full extension using crutches or a walker. Flexion during weight-bearing is strictly prohibited.
  • Thromboprophylaxis: Pharmacological anticoagulation according to AAOS/ACCP guidelines (aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or direct oral anticoagulants) for a minimum of 4–6 weeks.

Rehabilitation Protocol

Phase & TimelineImmobilization & Brace StatusRange of Motion (ROM) GoalsWeight-Bearing & Strengthening Activities
Phase I: Weeks 0–6Locked in full extension at 0° 24/7No active or passive flexion allowedWBAT in locked brace; ankle pumps; isometric quadriceps and gluteal sets in full extension.
Phase II: Weeks 6–8Hinged knee brace unlocked 0°–30°Gentle active-assisted flexion 0°–30°WBAT locked in extension during ambulation; gentle supine active-assisted heel slides within safe arc.
Phase III: Weeks 8–12Hinged brace unlocked 0°–60° (Weeks 8–10), then 0°–90° (Weeks 10–12)Progressive flexion to 90° by Week 12; prevent extensor lagWBAT; initiate closed-chain terminal knee extension exercises, stationary cycling with high seat once 90° flexion is attained.
Phase IV: > 12 WeeksWean brace for ambulation if active extension lag < 10°Maintain full extension, functional flexion > 90°–110°Progressive low-impact closed-chain resistance training, gait re-education, avoiding deep squats or high-impact running.

9. Outcome

Modern clinical evidence highlights distinct trade-offs between synthetic mesh and allograft reconstructions. Synthetic polypropylene mesh achieves superior long-term survival free from reconstruction failure (approximately 85–90% survivorship at 5 years) and significantly lower deep infection rates (5–7%) compared to extensor mechanism allografts (infection rates 12–15% and revision rates 20%).

Both techniques successfully eliminate crippling extensor lag in the majority of patients, reducing mean preoperative lag from 35–45° down to an average of 5–8° postoperatively. Functional Knee Society Scores (KSS) improve markedly from poor baseline levels (<45 points) to good functional ranges (75–85 points), returning previously wheelchair-bound or brace-dependent patients to independent community ambulation.

10. Complications

Complications following extensor mechanism repair in revision knee surgery remain common given the compromised biological envelope and multiple previous surgeries.

ComplicationIncidence RatePrimary Mechanism / Risk FactorsPrevention & Salvage Strategy
Persistent / Recurrent Extensor Lag10%–25%Graft stretch attenuation, under-tensioning during surgery, premature knee flexion during rehabilitationTension in full extension/hyperextension; strict 6–8 week brace immobilization; revision mesh augmentation if symptomatic.
Deep Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI)5%–15%Extensive surgical dissection, foreign body burden (mesh/allograft), compromised soft tissuesDefinitive PJI exclusion preoperatively; antibiotic-loaded bone cement; clean tissue margins; rotational flap coverage.
Construct Rupture / Suture Pullout5%–12%Aggressive early flexion, poor host bone purchase, thin mesh constructFold mesh into 8–10 layers; multi-screw and cement tibial fixation; heavy braided non-absorbable suture anchors.
Tibial Tubercle Fracture / Osteolysis3%–6%Excessive bone trough resection, stress riser creation at distal screw fixationAvoid sharp right-angled trough margins; use high-speed burrs; gentle cortical screw tightening with washers.
Wound Dehiscence & Skin Necrosis4%–8%Multiple prior midline skin incisions, excessive skin retraction, thin soft-tissue envelopeIncorporate most lateral scar; preserve full-thickness fasciocutaneous flaps; early plastic surgery consultation for gastrocnemius flap.

11. Evidence-Based Synthesis

Modern clinical decision-making is grounded in high-quality randomized controlled trials and prospective registry analyses, corroborated by seminal biomechanical and anatomical descriptions.

Clinical Question / InvestigationLevel of EvidencePivotal Landmark StudyStudy Design & MethodologyCohort Size / Follow-upPrimary Outcome / Effect SizeDOI
Repair vs reconstruction outcomes for extensor disruption in TKALevel IRajgopal A, Aggarwal K, Tripathi S (2025)Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis41 studies (1,489 knees; mean follow-up 48.2 months)Isolated direct repair failed in 38%; synthetic mesh and allograft achieved <10 deg lag with 11.2% and 14.5% failure ratesDOI
Comparative clinical efficacy and infection risk across repair techniquesLevel IViolante B, Compagnoni R, Kroell A et al (2026)Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis34 studies (1,120 patients; mean follow-up 4.1 years)Synthetic mesh yielded significantly lower deep infection (5.2% vs 12.1%, p=0.01) and equivalent extension lag restoration (6.8 deg vs 7.4 deg)DOI
Synthetic mesh vs allograft extensor reconstruction in revision TKALevel IShau D, Patton R, Patel S et al (2018)Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis18 studies (688 knees: 312 mesh, 376 allograft; mean follow-up 3.8 years)Synthetic mesh demonstrated lower risk of overall failure (RR 0.58, p=0.02) and deep infection (RR 0.44, p=0.03)DOI
Survivorship and revision rates of synthetic mesh vs allograftLevel IDeren ME, Pannu TS, Villa JM et al (2021)Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis13 studies (492 patients; mean follow-up 44 months)Synthetic mesh showed significantly lower reoperation for reconstruction failure (9.4% vs 19.8%, p=0.008) and reduced deep infectionDOI
Efficacy of synthetic polypropylene mesh for patellar tendon disruptionLevel IVBrowne JA, Hanssen AD (2011)Landmark Prospective Cohort13 consecutive knees (mean follow-up 42 months)Extensor continuity restored in 85% with mean lag improving from 41 deg to 4 deg, establishing mesh as allograft alternativeDOI
Graft tensioning and fixation technique in whole extensor allograftsLevel IVBurnett RS, Berger RA, Paprosky WG et al (2004)Landmark Comparative Cohort47 knees (mean follow-up 4.8 years)Tensioning in terminal extension yielded significantly less lag (9 deg vs 29 deg, p<0.001); graft attenuation occurred in 38%DOI

12. References

  • Rajgopal A, Aggarwal K, Tripathi S. Extensor mechanism disruption following primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00402-025-05991-w [Level I: Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis]
  • Violante B, Compagnoni R, Kroell A et al. Various surgical techniques result in different outcomes for full extensor mechanism ruptures following total knee replacement: A systematic review by the European Knee Associates (ESSKA-EKA). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2026. doi:10.1002/ksa.70015 [Level I: Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis]
  • Shau D, Patton R, Patel S et al. Synthetic mesh vs. allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction in total knee arthroplasty – A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Knee. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2017.12.004 [Level I: Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis]
  • Deren ME, Pannu TS, Villa JM et al. Meta-analysis Comparing Allograft to Synthetic Reconstruction for Extensor Mechanism Disruption after Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2021. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1696656 [Level I: Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis]
  • Browne JA, Hanssen AD. Reconstruction of patellar tendon disruption after total knee arthroplasty: results of a new technique utilizing synthetic mesh. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.01036 [Level IV: Landmark Prospective Cohort]
  • Burnett RS, Berger RA, Paprosky WG et al. Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction after total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of two techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004. doi:10.2106/00004623-200412000-00016 [Level IV: Landmark Comparative Cohort]

13. Master Class Pro-Tip

When reconstructing the extensor mechanism with synthetic mesh, always deflate the pneumatic tourniquet completely before performing proximal weave tensioning. An inflated thigh tourniquet exerts tremendous compressive shear across the mid-femoral diaphysis, anchoring the quadriceps muscle belly and falsely shortening its excursion. If you tension the mesh with the tourniquet inflated, the quadriceps will descend distalward as soon as the cuff is deflated, introducing an immediate 15° to 20° structural slack that guarantees chronic extensor lag. Deflate the cuff, wait two minutes for reperfusion, place the knee in zero degrees extension, apply maximal manual clamp traction, and secure your non-absorbable mattress sutures into the rectus femoris.

Master Class Surgical Pearl: Extensor Mechanism Reconstruction

Last Updated on September 27, 2026

🔗 Knowledge Graph & Clinical Correlates

OrthopaedicsOne Living Semantic Network

🩺 Clinical Conditions & Indications

  • Which EMR should I choose Original Clinical Contribution: Authored for the OrthopaedicsOne General Orthopaedics Specialty Section. Preserved, digitized, and updated to modern evidence-based...
  • Valgus-Unloader Bracing in Knee Osteoarthritis Original Clinical Contribution: Authored for the OrthopaedicsOne Adult Reconstruction Specialty Section. Preserved, digitized, and updated to modern evidence-based...
  • Valgus deformity of the knee Valgus deformity is a term for outward angulation of the distal segment of a bone or joint. The...

🔬 Anatomy, Pathology & Diagnostics

  • Why I Would Not Consider Navigating My THA Hip Joint & Proximal Femur
  • Why I Would Consider Navigating My THA Hip Joint & Proximal Femur
  • Why I Use Metal on Metal Hip Joint & Proximal Femur
  • Why I Use Cross-Linked Polyethylene Hip Joint & Proximal Femur

💼 Practice Management & Professional Operations

  • What Is the Evidence-Based Data for Mobile Bearing Knees Mobile and Wireless

🕸️ Semantic Relations (RDF)

ABOUT

  • Overview
  • FAQs
  • Managing Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Partners
  • Participating Groups
  • Advisory Board
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Contact Us

ARTICLES

  • Arthroscopy
  • Foot and Ankle
  • Hand and Wrist
  • Hip and Knee
  • Infection
  • Joint Reconstruction
  • Musculoskeletal Medicine
  • Pediatrics
  • Shoulder and Elbow
  • Spine
  • Sports Medicine
  • Trauma
  • Tumor

REVIEWS

  • For Residents
  • For Medical Students

EBOOKS

  • PORT Notes
  • MSK Medicine
  • Tumor Library

COMMUNITY

  • Talks
  • Images
  • Viewpoints
  • Question Bank
  • Devices

PAGES

  • Residency
  • Fellowships
  • Associations
  • Companies
Copyright © 2012-2026 OrthopaedicsOne | Privacy Policy | Dr. Christian Veillette . Powered by: OrthoNet - Empowering the Future of Orthopaedic Care
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top